Jehovah resurrected him, but Jesus himself had to rouse himself up into a standing position
Spike
I am not quite clear on what you are saying, ie He was raised in some disembodied way and then reconstructed his own body? Or it was "God" who raised his Temple/body?
Anyways, a Very convenient "original" WT answer that ensures the continued acceptance of their viewpoint. But it fails to deal honestly with the situation that brought about the statement.
I know it is a dirty word for Dubs, but contextually, Jesus had the verbal skills to ask them to respect his Fathers house, but dubs argue that in his next breath he didn't have the courtesy to give due credit for his future resurrection to the Father?
Such a gymnastical interpretation begs the question of why make such a statement, if you are a perfect man/angel, that was sure not to be understood by your audience (even disciples until much later)?
The more "Christlike" and truthful statement would then be "God" (since there is absolutely no evidence that Jesus ever called the father Jehober) would raise up this "Temple" (Jesus' body).
To give credit to himself even in a diminutive way would be out of character, even a dub would have to admit that
He would not have been branded a heretic, because who of those Jews would challenge God's ability to do it, nor would people today have anything to debate about as to who was who.
I appreciate your attempt at a response but perhaps you could enlighten us further or refute the above.
Frank75