Leolaia--- That is some far out stuff you come up with, is that your own personal take on things or is that part of some group think?
It's how most Bible scholars interpret the text. See Charles, Moffatt, Aune, Beale, etc. etc. It's also how the earliest Christian commentators interpreted the text, at least with respect to what Babylon, the Beast, etc. represent. It seems far out because you're out of touch with the historical and conceptual context of Revelation. Also, as I pointed out before, you also fail to realize that the interpretation of Babylon as Catholicism (or all "false religion" according to the Watchtower Society) owes its very existence to the earlier understanding that Babylon = Rome.
Now you are saying the seven heads are not seven hills but seven kings? I don't think you can have it both ways there .
LOL!!! The text has it both ways! That's the very point! Go read Revelation 17 again.
I thought the WTBTS came up with some doozies . Good God OK OK , so in your opinion what is the lamb beast that keeps projecting the image of the scarlet beast and forces all people to worship the image and take a mark on the their hand or forhead ?
This beast is the "false prophet" of 13:11-17, who induces the world to worship the Beast. Again, we need to read ch. 13-14 in light of the broader Antichrist tradition in Jewish and Christian apocalyptic literature. Many sources assume only one Antichrist, who is the Devil incarnate (cf. Didache 16:4, Sibylline Oracles 3.63-74, and Ascension of Isaiah 4:1-14, which explicitly identifies this figure as "Nero"), while others posit two figures: the Devil himself and his servant through whom the Devil works his evil (such as in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10, which distinguishes between "Satan" and the "Man of Lawlessness"; cf. also Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses 5.25-28). Revelation posits three figures: Satan, the Beast (= the Antichrist), and the False Prophet who induces the world to worship the Beast. While other apocalypses claim that the Antichrist alone is the one that performs signs and wonders, in Revelation, ch. 13, the Beast performs the wonder of raising himself up from the dead and the "false prophet" also "worked great miracles, even calling down fire from heaven" (13:12). The main role of the "false prophet" is to act as a ringleader to force the world to worship and follow the Beast instead of Christ.
Since the author intends the mythological Antichrist figure to be realized as a Roman emperor along the lines of the Nero redivivus rumor, it is possible that the "false prophet" is to be identified with the person who had the same role in the Roman Empire as attributed to the second beast in Revelation: the high priest of the imperial cult (as suggested by Aune and others). Thus in 13:14, "he told those who dwell on the earth to make a cult statue in honor of the Beast", which as we know from ch. 17 represents the emperor, and "anyone who refused to worship the statue (i.e. all the faithful Christians) were put to death" (v. 15). Compare the Ascension of Isaiah 4:8-11 concerning the returned Nero, that "all the people in the world will sacrifice to him ... and he will set up his image before him in every city". Enforced idolatry was exactly what happened in Asia Minor, especially in the same cities that Revelation is addressed to, where imperial altars have widely been found and where civic decrees were promulgated prescribing all citizens participate in the worship of the emperor. For instance, Pliny described how he ordered Christians to make "offerings of wine and incense to your [i.e. Emperor Trajan's] statue which I had ordered to be brought into court for this purpose along with the images of the gods" (Epistle 10.96.5-6). As I mentioned earlier, the cult of the goddess Roma was based in Asia Minor (the first temple built in Smyrna in the first century BC), and her temples were centers of the imperial cult. The high priest of the imperial cult during the reign of Augustus had the title "the high priest of the goddess Roma and the Emperor Caesar Augustus, the son of God", and he was located in the city of Pergamum (the same city in Revelation 3:13, where "Satan himself lives" and where Christians were being induced to commit idolatry and eat "food sacrificed to idols", as 3:14-15). After the reign of Augustus, the high priest of the Asian imperial cult was called "high priest of Asia" (arkhierous Asias). The "false prophet" however not only has the role of inducing worship and "giving breath" to the statue, but also political power in forcing everyone who wanted to "buy or sell" to accept the mark of the Beast. This suggests that the "high priest" here also has the powers of Asiarch.
I think you are saying that whoever wrote revelation was just interpreting some pagan beliefs instead of divine visions ? Makes no sense to me ....
What pagan beliefs? BTW, the idea of Nero redivivus wasn't "pagan", it was shared by pagans, Jews, and Christians alike. It was a rumor that was widespread throughout the empire.