The sad part is that most of the best arguments for creationism are in there.. this kind of logic is not limited to a few dumbasses, this is the kind of trap fallen into by anyone who claims that creationism is "proven" or that there is somehow evidence of it, or that it holds it's own against evolution as a theory.
As per usual, science is twisted and perverted: the claim that evolution represents randomness when it does not. The assumption that complexity and order can only come from equal or greater complexity and order, which forms a logical trap that cannot be salvaged, it can only be ignored and denied. If complexity can only come from equal or greater complexity, then where did the previous complexity come from?