>>@Barbie your rollin over laughing jus confrim that you really cant answer the question!
Sorry, I stepped out for a while. Like Lore, I'm afraid I missed the question you were looking to have answered. Could you restate it?
I asked earlier about any "design flaws" you might know about in nature because if they exist, it would call into the question the idea that everything was perfectly designed. I agree, if everything was absolutely perfect, that would be cause to wonder if some intelligent being had a hand in it. It wouldn't be proof, but it would at least give one pause.
However, there ARE flaws in the design of nature. For instance, you and I need to consume vitamin C. Dogs don't. The reason is that, while we both have genes for manufacturing vitamin C, our version of it is broken. It's there where it's supposed to be, but it doesn't work. So while dogs (and virtually all other mammals) make their own vitamin C, we (and chimps) have to consume it. It's not a crippling flaw, but why is there at all? Why would anyone design a gene to accomplish such a noble task, then disable it?
Another curiosity, though perhaps not a flaw, is your lack of a tail. Or rather, the reason you lack one. You carry genes that tell your body how to grow a tail, but you also carry genes that turn those genes off. The result -- no tail. Why would anyone insert instructions to build a structure, and then include further instructions to disable them?
I hope you can see why this at least raises some red flags. Surely you can agree that it would not be foolish to at least ask ourselves the above questions, and honestly seek their answers. Can't you?
Dave
.....
...OUTLAW