"Such an evil star"

by Yadirf 56 Replies latest jw friends

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf

    December 29, 1999

    Writing Department
    25 Columbia Heights
    Brooklyn, NY 11201-2483

    Dear Writers/Brothers:

    A warm hello to all you there at Bethel -- a name which means “House of God,” and suggests that “Truly Jehovah is in this place.” -- Genesis 28:16-19.

    My purpose in writing you is twofold. One is that I wanted to make known how glad I am to be the possessor of a bit of knowledge that became mine as a result of the Society’s publications. (Ro 1:12) The other is, with a sense of responsibility, that the members of my personal family, by having a copy of the comments contained herein, may be fortified with the facts regarding this vital truth.

    At the time of the year just past, throughout the neighborhoods and commercial districts we see evidence of the benightedness that grips much of the world: Placed on the top of many Christmas trees, or displayed in some other manner, is the symbol of “the star” that Satan used in his attempt to thwart God’s purpose. (Mt 2:1-18) How happy we can be that we have had our thinking faculties stirred with the result being that we can discern that the real source of the mysterious star which captured the astrologers (“Magi,” NIV) attention was Satan, not God. Can anyone among us claim to have learned the truth on this subject from any other religious institution? Furthermore, how many of us ever would have learned it on our own had we never had contact with the organization that stressed its importance? The answer to both questions is: Likely, none at all!

    But just how vital is the knowing of the source behind this star which has become a Christmas symbol? In observing the world’s practices, how so very sad and appalling it is to witness the fact that honor and admiration is actually given to that which was nothing less than a detestable tool of Satan. The so-called “Star of Bethlehem,” a tool which, had it been successful in accomplishing its intended goal -- namely, Jesus’ death while yet a child -- would have thus interfered with Jehovah’s means for the very salvation of man. (John 3:16) Thus, those who indulge in such practice are, though unknowingly, giving honor to what was a Satanic scheme which seriously threatened their (1 John 2:2) very prospect of living forever. How ghastly! Somewhat comparable to kissing the knife that would cut your throat. Certainly, no informed, right-minded person would wish to ascribe nobility to such evil “star.”

    Unwittingly, the churches of Christendom help to obscure the truth regarding “the star.” An example of this is the recent appeal for financial support, seen on television’s Trinity Broadcasting Net-work (TBN). For a monetary offering viewers would be sent an ornament that was usable either as the centerpiece of a Christmas table or for decorating the tree. According to the advertisement, this ornament, which has the manger scene with the star overhead, “depicts the Star of Bethlehem keeping watch over the newborn Christ child.” Thus, the star is portrayed as having stood guard over the welfare of Jesus when in fact its purpose was to cause his premature death, the very opposite of the truth. -- 2 Corinthians 11:12-15.

    Also, there are the lyrics of Christmas carols which present the star in a favorable light, thereby attributing what is good to that which in reality is bad (Isa 5:20), as seen in the following examples:

    -- Holy Night: “So, led by light of a star sweetly gleaming.”
    -- Silent Night: “Wondrous star, lend thy light!”
    -- We Three Kings Of Orient Are: “O, star of wonder, star of night, star of royal beauty bright.”

    With you in honoring God, not Satan.

    Yadirf

  • ofcmad
    ofcmad

    *********Unwittingly, the churches of Christendom help to obscure the truth regarding “the star.” An example of this is the recent appeal for financial support, seen on television’s Trinity Broadcasting Net-work (TBN). **********

    I wonder who is assigned to watch TBN at the Society. They might have to change people out every so often so they don't start to learn truth.

    Ofcmad

    "Noah was a drunk and look what he accomplished." The Metatron/Dogma
  • Cygnus
    Cygnus

    What a party pooper you are!

    Do you really believe that there was one iota of a possibility that Jehovah would allow the baby Messiah to be killed in that manner? Why did Satan have to manufacture some ambiguous star and hope that somebody would notice it and follow it when there are much more straightforward ways to accomplish the task of murdering an infant? Indeed, isn't it just a goofy story at all, invisible men in the sky playing what amounts to a game of checkers?

  • COMF
    COMF

    You signed your letter to Brooklyn "Yadirf?"

    COMF

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf

    Cygnus

    What a party pooper you are!
    I ain't never pooped at a party in my life!
    Do you really believe that there was one iota of a possibility that Jehovah would allow the baby Messiah to be killed in that manner?
    I wasn’t the one that cooked up the scheme, Cygnus. But apparently the one that did, namely SATAN, thought it was possible to thwart God’s purposes by causing the death of the Messiah in such a stealthy manner. Considering what is at stake for Satan -- his very existence -- is it not only to be expected that he would try ANYTHING which might interfere with the success of God’s purposes?
    Why did Satan have to manufacture some ambiguous star and hope that somebody would notice it and follow it when there are much more straightforward ways to accomplish the task of murdering an infant?
    I suppose you mean for example: Why didn’t Satan simply cause some demonic individual to attack the child and kill it? … In other words, why go to the enormous extent of working through a “star”, some astrologers, and a jealous King (Herod) in order to accomplish what might have otherwise been pulled off by means of a seemingly much simpler method?

    That’s an interesting point to consider. One could entertain the same question with regards to why Satan chose to use the Serpent as a medium to deceive Eve. Why do you suppose he didn’t go about the deceiving of Eve in a “much more straightforward way”? For example, couldn’t he have simply spoken to Eve directly?

    Everything indicates that Satan elects to accomplish his deeds via deception which arouses a great deal of CURIOSITY in those whom he is attempting to influence. Just as a shy, legless Serpent which for ONCE didn’t flee at Eve’s approach was sure to freeze her attention, in the same manner an unusual/ irregular/strange light hovering low overhead would have the same effect upon those who regularly studied the heavens. I think that Satan must have thought that working through a jealous King would be a more surefire method accomplishing Jesus’ death than going the other route of hoping to do the same thing through someone with less power of control. The fact that Herod did in fact cause the deaths of so many children who were two years old and under testified to the power he had. So why, then, would Satan elect to use someone with less power?

    Indeed, isn't it just a goofy story at all, invisible men in the sky playing what amounts to a game of checkers?
    Actually, Cygnus, I don’t really think even YOU believe that!

    Yadirf

    PS> I don't understand why I'm not being notified by email whenever someone replies to this topic??? I always check the box that's supposed to make that happen. Guess I'll have to take that up with Simon.

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf

    COMF

    You signed your letter to Brooklyn "Yadirf?"

    No, I deleted my real name and address in this posting ... and just didn't make that plain. I'm not sure I want to run the risk of everyone knowing my exact whereabouts. I think that you can understand that.

    Why did you place your question mark inside the ending quotation mark? Am I gonna have to re-educate you about such things, COMF?

    Well, I guess I won't make fun of your failings there if you won't make fun of the way I hold my drumsticks.

    Yadirf
    .

  • COMF
    COMF

    Why did you place your question mark inside the ending quotation mark? Am I gonna have to re-educate you about such things, COMF?

    I put it there because that's where it goes. Before you attempt to re-educate anyone, better do a little refreshing, yourself. I would wholeheartedly agree that it should be outside the quote, since it's no part of what's being quoted. I griped about it to my English professor, too, to no avail. So I caved in and started doing it the proper way instead of the right way.

    Well, I guess I won't make fun of your failings there if you won't make fun of the way I hold my drumsticks.

    Good piece of insight there. :)

    COMF

  • expatbrit
    expatbrit
    Question Marks or Exclamation Points in Quotations

    If a question or exclamation is quoted directly, the quotation contains the question mark or exclamation point.

    If the question or exclamation is at the end of the quotation, the question mark or exclamation point comes before the closing quotation mark.

    Incorrect: "Look at that"! he exclaimed. "Did you see that"?
    Correct: "Look at that!" he exclaimed. "Did you see that?"
    (Question mark or exclamation point comes before quotation mark.)

    A question mark can be found outside the quotation mark if the sentence is asking about a quotation, but the quotation itself is not a question.

    Incorrect: Did Mark Antony say, "Friends, Romans, countrymen?"
    (A question is not being quoted. The speaker is asking about a quotation.)
    Correct: Did Mark Antony say, "Friends, Romans, countrymen"?

    In the rare case where the question is about a quotation ending in a question, the sentence ends with a single question mark before the quotation mark.

    Incorrect: Who said,"Et tu, Bruté?"?
    (Second question mark redundant)
    Correct: Who said,"Et tu, Bruté?"

    Source: http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000104.htm

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    Incorrect: Did Mark Antony say, "Friends, Romans, countrymen?"
    (A question is not being quoted. The speaker is asking about a quotation.)
    Correct: Did Mark Antony say, "Friends, Romans, countrymen"?

    How about this, COMF? It looks to me like your English professor is at odds with-- http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000104.htm

    You had asked:

    You signed your letter to Brooklyn "Yadirf?"
    Compare:
    You signed your letter to Brooklyn "Yadirf?"
    Did Mark Antony say, "Friends, Romans, countrymen"?
    Yadirf
    .

    Daniel 11:35 ... a prophecy that must be fulfilled before the "time of the end" gets underway.

  • detective
    detective

    There is no suggestion in the bible whatsoever that the star was sent by satan. It's not in the bible. That is just witless doctrine and is completely unfounded. Watched the Leonid Shower last night, by the way. Just for the record, satan wasn't responsible for that light show either.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit