What do you know about 'CHEMTRAILS'?

by Gill 105 Replies latest jw friends

  • Gill
    Gill

    Another failed link! Must be a conspiracy!

    Try google 'British Government admits chemtrail chemical spraying' and you should find information on Norman Baker the British MP who got this information revealed to the public.

  • jstalin
    jstalin

    I see a lot of sites referring to a Guardian article, yet none are quoting it directly, nor linking to it. When you find the actual Guardian arcticle, let me know.

  • chrisjoel
    chrisjoel

    JSTALIN..your killing me lmao....ok , what about this one comment on THIS one:

    http://http://www.carnicom.com/

  • chrisjoel
    chrisjoel

    OH..did U say you wanted a scientist/or bonafide papers ?

    THIS Canadian atmospheric scientist warns that chemtrails, airliners and shuttle launches are weakening the stratosphere and destroying Earth’s ozone layer—threatening all life on Earth.


    Ken Caldeira
    Department of Global Ecology
    Carnegie Institution of Washington
    260 Panama St.
    Stanford, CA 94305
    phone: (650) 704-7212
    email: [email protected]

    http://globalecology.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab/


    http://www.thelastoutpost.com/site/1471/default.aspx

    Also,

    IN 2002 Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) had introduced a bill called the “Space Preservation Act of 2001,” also known as HR 2977, in the House of Representatives in October. The original bill would have banned chemtrails and mind control weapons in space, including “psychotronic” devices “directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of…mood management, or mind control.” We noted that the introduction of such a bill suggests that the U.S. military has already developed classified mood and mind control weapons (or are planning to do so) and that chemtrails are real.
    The earlier bill prohibited “exotic weapons systems,” defined as “weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.” The bill may have received a poor initial reaction from the House, because it has now been rewritten and is called HR 3616, “Space Preservation Act of 2002.” The new bill was introduced January 23. The main difference between HR 2977 and HR 3616 is that the new bill eliminates all mention of chemtrails, ELF and mind control. Kucinich explains his new bill by saying, “We signed the ABM treaty nearly 30 years ago; which requires a reduction in strategic arms, nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. Weaponization of space clearly violates that treaty. My bill will call for an immediate and permanent termination of research, testing, manufacturing, production and deployment of all space-based weapons systems and components by any person, agency or contractor of the U.S. government .”

    It’s expected there will be a lot of opposition to this bill, since if the Senate passed a version of it as well, it would mean the end of the end of the “Star Wars” space-based defense system, which is being heavily promoted by this administration.

    The text of the new bill is below: Space Preservation Act of 2002 (Introduced in the House) HR 3616 IH 107th CONGRESS 2nd Session H.R. 3616 To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 23, 2002 Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the 'Space Preservation Act of 2002'. SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE. Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'. SEC. 3. BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT. The President shall-- (1) implement a ban on space-based weapons of the United States and the use of weapons of the United States to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit; and (2) immediately order the termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States. SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL TREATY BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT. The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing an international treaty banning space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit. SEC. 5. REPORT. The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter, a report on-- (1) the implementation of the ban on space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit required by section 3; and (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the treaty described in section 4. SEC. 6. SPACE-BASED NONWEAPONS ACTIVITIES. Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for-- (1) space exploration; (2) space research and development; (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems. SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) The term 'space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space. (2) The terms `space-based weapon' and `space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by-- (A) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object or person; (B) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person; (C) directing a source of energy against that object or person; or (D) any other undeveloped means.

  • chrisjoel
  • chrisjoel
  • chrisjoel
    chrisjoel

    are you kidding me? JUST CAUSE YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT IT DOESNT MEAN IT S NOT HAPPENING DOES IT?

    http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/should-governme.html

  • What-A-Coincidence
    What-A-Coincidence

    That's what happens when u drink fluoridated water ... it's documented that it lowers your IQ by 10 points.

  • jstalin
    jstalin
    http://http://www.carnicom.com/

    I thought going through those others would be enough, but sure, I'll bite. Who is Clifford Carnicom? Well, the site doesn't say. No bio, no personal information at all. The site has articles on "observed anomalies," basically pictures of "chemtrails" which prove nothing at all. And he appears to be doing some sort of medical work by removing tissue from peoples' gums, but readily admits he is not a physician.

    Quack quack.

  • jstalin
    jstalin
    That's what happens when u drink fluoridated water ... it's documented that it lowers your IQ by 10 points.

    Ah yes, when all else fails, resort to ad hominem.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit