I am still very troubled you use quotation marks round the word victim, when talking about people who have been raped, and then refuse to clarify whether of not you are a misogynist, instead concentrating on my spelling.
In fact if you hadn't been so rude I would have not bothered replying, as I see no possible outcome other than you becoming increasingly abusive and hypocritical. But I'm going to ignore it... I apologise if I have in any way insulted you and caused you to return like for like, I'll try to, what's the saying... turn the other cheek...? and hope you do the same.
Here's what Genesis says, maybe you'll listen to that;
1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Now, I will assume you are an old Earth creationist. If you are a new Earth creationist, please say... I need a laugh... but no doubt to you this is a timeless period of time, no contradiction to science there. Fine.
2. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Okay, now, no doubt you will go into the Hebrew if I point out that we have light before sources of light, fine, you can argue that so it seems scientifically sound to you.
6. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Ah, day two we have problems... water above and water below? You're not going to talk about the thermosphere are you? You might, but you have no proof even if you do, but hell, I said I was going to point out the order of creation was wrong, so we'll ignore little problems with physics, for now...
9. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good. 11. And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. 12. And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 13. And the evening and the morning were the third day.
Ah, I'm feeling charitable; we'll assume this is a theoretical observer's view point, and that thus we miss out on smaller organisms, and we'll ignore the types of plants that are not even mentioned, we'll ignore that the light reaching the surface is so dim you can't even see a solar disc (assuming you go for the Borg line of the Hebrew word in vs. 16 being create in the progresive sense), we're doing fine. Maybe all the plants were shade loving species back then? Very scientific.
14. And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: 15. And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. 16. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, 18. And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. 19. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
Funny, I always thought that axial rotation defined night and day, as orbital rotation defines years, but despite it SOUNDING like this person thinks the lights are responsible for this, we'll assume this is not un-scientific. At least we can now see what's going on properly, eh? Those plants must be happy!
20. And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. 21. And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 22. And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. 23. And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
Ah, well, here we have whales being created before land animals. Fossil evidence shows this is not true (they probably evolved from a land animal similar to a Hippo). We have birds being created before the land animals. Fossil evidence shows this is not true (they probably evolved from dinosaurs). So, even if we assume that the fossil record does not support evolution, we have no bird or whale bones older than the land animals that are meant to have been created after them. So, the Genesis account does not give the right order of creation, so the Bible is not perfect, or not meant to be taken literally. For proof, well, hell, what were you doing in science lessons? This is covered in any decent Biology textbook!
24. And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 25. And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26. And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. 29. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 31. And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
So we have the land animals being created, and man... and no major problems with these being the last in the order of things, apart from the fact, as pointed out above, that the Bible says things we know only lived AFTER the land animals were apparently made BEFORE.
A small problem? My point Pom, is that your interpretation of god, based upon your apparently literal interpretation of the Bible, cannot be taken as definative or even better than mine, as the Bible is demonstrably (Genesis Chp 1. Vrs 20 is only the first example) either uninspired or not meant to be taken literally.
I would love to see you prove the contrary.
Light and love to you...
People living in glass paradigms shouldn't throw stones...
