EPA supresses study skeptical of global warming.

by BurnTheShips 79 Replies latest members politics

• 

  BurnTheShips

  Political goals come first, damn the inconvenient truths.

  http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/26/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5117890.shtml?tag=blogs

  BTS
• 

  Caedes

  Carlin has an undergraduate degree in physics from CalTech and a PhD in economics from MIT.

  So that would be a "study" from someone who isn't a scientist?
• 

  drwtsn32

  So that would be a "study" from someone who isn't a scientist?

  Definitely not a climatologist, that's for sure.

  I hate how politicized this issue is. The biases on both sides make it difficult to get to the real truth.
• 

  SixofNine

  " The biases on both sides make it difficult to get to the real truth."

  I guess you could say that about almost any any issue. The side with the truth has complete legitimacy to it's bias however.
• 

  besty

  Climate change deniers provide a similiar function to JW apologists such as RNIA and SCLR

  They vainly attempt to support a long debunked position held only by those ignoring the overwhelming evidence. Why? They have an theological or ideological construct that cannot be perturbed by the facts.

  'celebrated scholars' - we salute you in your ongoing efforts to let others see the truth :-))))))))
• 

  JeffT

  Climate change believers provide a similiar function to JW apologists such as RNIA and SCLR

  They vainly attempt to support a popular and deeply held belief only by ignoring any evidence they disagree with. Why? They have a theological or ideological construct that cannot be perturbed by the facts.

  'celebrated scholars' - we salute you in your ongoing efforts to let others see the truth :-))))))))
• 

  read good books

• "The 'science' underpinning climate alarmism is all funded by today's increasingly totalitarian political institutions - the UK and EU being the typical cases - for the express purpose of giving them arguments to further extend the control of the state over society.
  The IPCC's climate change 'science' is thus no more objective than the tobacco companies' 'science' on smoking and cancer. In both cases, 'scientists' are selected and funded on the basis of how closely their views match those of their paymasters. "

• Have fun paying your hundreds of new Global Carbon Taxes.