by BurnTheShips 79 Replies latest members politics
Weren't those periods with higher concentrations of carbon dioxide un-livable for humans. It was great for arthropods, but mamals weren't around in that period.
If you want to say it's just a natural change for Earth that's fine, it wouldn't change the fact that we won't survive it's change.
Witness 007,
Where is this positive proof? Where you reading a different article? There is no study being suppressed, just a report by an economist (I am sure we all have an opinion on the worth of economists).
I would love for global warming to not be true but so far I haven't seen one single piece of scientific evidence from a credible scientist that shows it to be incorrect.
Those DAMN CAVE MEN AND THERE CARS! Look at those figures! They must have had alot of factories running to cause such "global warming."
Weren't those periods with higher concentrations of carbon dioxide un-livable for humans. It was great for arthropods, but mamals weren't around in that period.
Funny, most evolution and emergent biodiversity occurred when Co2 was much higher than now. I am pretty sure that if it was livable for T-Rex, homo sapiens won't have much trouble either. Besides, mammals have been around since at least the Jurassic, when CO2 PPM was over 2000. The biomass at the time was enormous. Where do you think all that oil and coal came from?
BTS
Why don't you tell me, Besty? BTS
erm - I asked a read good books a question and you have responded <on his behalf?> with a cut and paste graph and a question of your own....
I don't think so....
Let's see what RGB comes up with before I deal with you.
most enlightening - anything else to add?
what's up, I can't post??? To much carbon dioxide on this board??? Now I have to go I had a good answer for you Besty will try later see if this even posts!!!
exhaling heavily over your keyboard can cause these blanks to fire :-)
