While some historical events in the bible can be verified and some are part of secualr history, others are mcuh debated in terms of how one shoudl interpret them.
When it's wrong, it's wrong. I love how some are so sure in the face of overwhelming evidence that it is a matter of interpretation.
No flood, no exodus, no 12-tribe Kingdom under David and Solomon, no Garden of Eden just over 6000 years ago, the first temple was smaller than the second (not the grand description in the Bible).
I guess the way those should be interpreted is that they are figurative. Adam, Eve, the Garden represent primitive man's finally reaching past tribal religious beliefs? They were the first monotheists?
I suppose I could go on and on dismissing the literalness of it all, but then the lessons should be clearer. At the end of a fictional story, the Bible should say "The moral of this story is...."