My point is that there is always a middle ground.
Either you stopped beating your wife or you did not.
I will assume you have not stopped beating your wife as I will assume you never started beating her.
But to narrow someone to only be able to answer one extreme or the other of that statement gives the reader the incorrect assumption that you did, at some point, beat your wife. The same things happens when you narrow someone to only be able to answer in one extreme or the other with your statements.
Look, I'm not an atheist. Nor am I a believer. I accept that I don't have the answers and that I don't need to have the answers to have a fulfilling life. Your argument just made absolutely no sense to me. Just as mine made no sense to you. Perhaps that simply means we are human and each have our own ways of seeing things.
It's a tired, narrow argument that perhaps reflects the mindset of those who use it.
If you mean that my mindset is tired and narrow... well, you are welcome to your opinion, I suppose :::smile:::