Information taken out of context was their ‘strong evidence’ against us.
This reads as though he found allegations against The Society's literature that were taken out of context..If so, what about the many of us who spent so many years within it that we didn't need to look up what they had said, we knew it all backwards. No hiding behind false words there.
If he meant that the information was from other history, religious or scientific writings then of course he should check that it is not out of context. That is common sense. I have checked all the major arguments because at at first I was highly suspicious of writings that contradicted what they said. The result? I have found only minuscule tiny things that could be challenged. The "apostates " use of reference works has been far more honest than is the WTS' use of such writings....
Of course they would say this, wouldn't they?.....I challenge any lurkers to check it out for yourself before making up your mind...The internet is wonderful !