Some other interesting things about the quote:
But later, as I did some research on the apostates’ arguments against Jehovah’s Witnesses, I became aware of how crafty the false teachers were. Information taken out of context was their ‘strong evidence’ against us. Thus, I decided to start reading our publications again and to attend the meetings. Soon I realized how much I had missed.” Happily, Andre returned to the congregation.
"I did some research". Doesn't the Society frown down upon "independent research"? So if you happen to be a JW who has been secretly reading "apostate" info on the internet, this article suggests that you don't have to run away at once from the info (which elsewhere they have characterized as "poison"). You can -- as Andre did -- do some research on the info to see if the claims are in fact true. I wonder if the Society realizes that not everyone who does what Andre did would come to the same conclusion. As the experiences of newbies to JWN attest, many people are coming to their own realizations about the "trooth" through doing such research.
Andre also shifts the locus of the "apostate" critique from the organization itself (information that would make Andre feel, as he says, justified in "leaving Jehovah's organization") to Jehovah's Witnesses personally, such that the "evidence" becomes evidence not against the organization, but against "us". This reflects a total identification of the organization with individual JWs. This identification continues in the next sentence when Andre refers to the Society's publications as "our publications". Identity as a JW is bound up with the organization and if the organization is threatened, Andre is himself threatened if he maintains his JW identity. This illustrates again the importance of maintaining the distinction between criticizing the organization and attacking JWs personally.