The Gentile Times Reconsidered

by Spade 382 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • palmtree67
    palmtree67

    This has turned out to be a great thread on the subject!

    I hope newbies will read past Alice's initial uninformed post.

    You all did a great job!!

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    More support for 607 BCE..

    607 BCE is Correct because.. I eat Ice-Cream..

    and..

    Ride on the Back of a Garbage Truck..

    http://cache1.asset-cache.net/xc/78766468.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=1F05BD613EAB79924F3E9C6D5AAE7ABD66EA4AA166099C5C

    ........................... ...OUTLAW

  • bohm
    bohm

    Spade/whatever: bla bla bla cylinder 28 cm ZOMG WTF bla bla bla loollllll!!!!!1 bla bla bla 2+2 = 3 bla bla hail the queen spider bla bla bla GOTO START.

    TD: Spade/Alice

    If you accept the 539 BC date, do you also accept that Cyrus was king for 29 years, died nine years after he conquered Babylon and therefore defeated Astyages of Media, captured Ecbatana and united the kingdoms of Media and Persia in the year 550 BC?

    Spadinator: Whats your point?

    TD: The same historians and scholars who give us the 539 BC date also give us the details I described on page 1. Do you or do you not accept them? Glueland: (runs) classic smackdown.
  • wobble
    wobble

    Outlaw, you are priceless !

    If I ever pass near Mad Ranch, where you live, I am going to drop in with acouple of barrells of beer for us to damage !

    607 the year where nothing happened ! Google it, nothing happened ! Quite rare in those days, usually some king or other was killing another king, 607......Zilch !

  • miseryloveselders
    miseryloveselders

    607 the year where nothing happened ! Google it, nothing happened ! Quite rare in those days, usually some king or other was killing another king, 607......Zilch !

    Funny you say that because the new Jeremiah book released last year has a question for one of the paragraphs that asks, "What happened in 607 B.C.?" I don't know if we'll every do that book at the Congregation Bible Studies, but it will be interesting if we do.

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Sounds good Wobble..You bring the Beer..I`ll do the Cooking..

    I have Certificates on my wall that say I know how..

    ........................... ...OUTLAW

  • brotherdan
    brotherdan
    "What happened in 607 B.C.?"

    It'd be awesome to answer, "Nothing"

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW
    607 the year where nothing happened ! Google it, nothing happened !
    Quite rare in those days, usually some king or other was killing another king, 607......Zilch !.....Wobble

    607 is a New York Area code..

    The Watchtower is in Brooklyn,New York..

    The Watchtower used a local Telephone Book to come up with the 607 BCE date..

    It was sittiing right on a Desk at Bethel and no one had to go to the Library to do any Research..

    Rolf Furuli who`s Education is in Lingusitics..Was able to read the Telephone Book and Confirm the WBT$`s Discovery..

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_GA1ftsFJZu8/TUrXqcA_12I/AAAAAAAAAiU/2OjWECD6n4Q/s1600/telephone%2Bbook.jpg

    ........................... ...OUTLAW

  • diamondiiz
    diamondiiz

    Russell calculations:

    6000 years of human history = 1874 = Jesus return in 1874

    WTS today

    6000 years of human history = 1975 = Jesus return in 1914

    Why didn't wts change Jesus' return from 1874 to 1975 if they were just correctling Russell's error?

    ----

    Russell based 1914 on 536BC as Cyrus first year because the information used was trying to unify history and bible where 538BC was moved to 536BC. Back then Russell claimed that 536 was Cyrus first year as king, why isn't this information used today but a claim that it took two years for Jews to return to their homeland. Russell was willing to move 1914 to 1915 since it wasn't all important date to him but 1874 was.

    ----

    Russell proved beyong a doubt that 1914 was supported by 40 year harvest work from 1874 so where does this fit into 1914 if 6000 years of human history ends in 1975? Also 36.5 years perallel prophecy proved the 1914 had to be the end of the last days, so where does that caclulation fit in today?

    ----

    That's right, wts i full of shit and the ONLY reason they kept 1914 was because there was a WW1 or they would have absolutely nothing to back they nonsense with. If 1878 had a great war and nothing happened in 1914 they would have eliminated 1914.

    ----

    WTS followers will accept artifacts proving 539BC for the fall of Jerusalem but the same artifacts they claim are wrong about 587BC?

    WTS won't show any archaeological evidence for 607BC but will reject all evidence for 587BC. The only tools that wts has is deception, ignorance and stupidity on their part and on the part of those who listen to them without checking their references. And we have stupid people like spade who post crap here just to piss people off.

    So, the thing for spade to think about is that since s/he's not a witness or is a witness but is disobeying GB by posting here, s/he will die with it's offspring at Armageddon and the bird will eat your flesh. Isn't that a pretty picture Spade?

  • Witness My Fury
    Witness My Fury

    @diamondiiz ...539 for fall of Babylon. But we know what you meant.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit