I had not come across this before. But the guy called eggnog or such in his 532 submission is no doubt a JW. He follows the pattern I saw in my earliest contact with the 'truth' that no one giving a talk ever uses two or three words if they can use 100.
Think of the great speeches of human kind. In no order;
The Gettysburg address. This took Lincoln apx 20 minutes to recite. Anyone recall the name of the Senator who ambled on for two hours before Lincoln? No of course not.
The sermon on the mount. Just reading it slowly from the scriptures and allowing for questions from listeners there. How long did Jesus take to deliver it?
Winston Churchills, 'Battle of Britain' speech.. "their finest hour.." mere minutes and he steeld a nation and a Commonwealth against the Nazis.
and so many WT speakers are what I call "Scripture strafers". They barely begin their talk and its this quote then that one then another and the audience has no time to think(!) and h'es off on a stream of further quotes. Using the scriptures like a drunk uses a light poll for support rather than illumination.
Jesus parables. Nice simple (not crass) illustrations. How long did he take to deliver them?
My pet peeve with elders and WT talks? So many of the speakers think they are stand up commedians and have the need to make silly little jokes about things this occurs particularly during the WT study. Result? 80% of the cong dont reply out of fear of being ridiculed those that do are the old set or propmpted children but NONE of the young people.
I rest my case.