Was A Cancer Cure Quietly Eliminated?

by metatron 68 Replies latest jw friends

  • metatron
    metatron

    See:

    http://www.rexresearch.com/mebendazole/mebendazole.htm

    Do a Google on this and the subject gets interesting. The science and research was there, in hand, and it was quietly discontinued.

    metatron

  • still thinking
    still thinking

    Thats an interesting read...pharmaceutical companies would not want this to become widely known if indeed it is true...there are no $$$$$$$ in it.

  • TOTH
    TOTH

    MegaPharmas make no money on a cure for anything. Neither do doctors.

    I can say THIS from my experience as a patient...They keep you going back and back and back as long as your wallet or insurance has money to pay them. ANYTHING they give you to relieve symptoms usually has side effects that cause other problems. I took Celebrex for my arthritis. It made my kidneys nearly fail. I took Imitrex for migraines and had a heart attack. They NEVER fix anything. No money in that.

  • talesin
    talesin

    Call me suspicious, but my question would be "How many [cancer] cures have been quietly eliminated?"

    gotta love capitalism and big corporations - NOT!

    tal

  • Black Sheep
    Black Sheep

    It doesn't sound too promising when the header reads...

    Mebendazole -- Inexpansive Cancer Cure?

  • JonathanH
    JonathanH

    There is no "cure" for cancer. Cancer is not a thing, it is a classification of a cellular disorder. Saying "we have a cure for cancer" is like saying "we have a cure for virus." Really? Which virus? Or just "virus"? There are countless kinds of cancer and just as many causes. When biologists and doctors do research, they don't try to "cure cancer" (that is just a good line to give the public), rather they are trying to find ways to successfully treat specific kinds of cancer in specific areas of the body that don't kill the person they are treating.

    So, sure. Yeah, we found a "cure" for virus, and a "cure" for cancer and a "cure" for death too. But big pharma just covered them all up. Don't let people tell you that all conspiracy theorists are conservative nut jobs. There exist liberal conspiracy theories too, and this is one of them.

  • Botzwana
    Botzwana

    I had cancer back in 1997. I am a cancer survivor. I know what I am talking about. The cure for cancer is found at your local grocery store. A box of baking soda mixed in water twice daily will cure it if you have it.

  • talesin
    talesin

    Just to note, I deliberately put cancer in parentheses. My intent in doing that was to directly imply 'cures' in general.

    Let's not forget the medical profession's lack of outcry about the dangers of smoking. For decades. C. Everett Koop changed all that, though. I have a great deal of respect for him because of that.

    It's not all the fault of researchers that some valuable information is buried. How does the research 'system' work? Well, universities and hospitals use public 'begathons' to get regular folks to donate millions of $$$ for research. They also get huge government funding. When all the groundwork is done, the pharmaceutical companies take over for the final testing, then market their product. THEY own the patents, so we the public, have little knowledge of what is really going on [even though WE paid for the bulk of the research]. One of the largest medical research facillities in Canada happens to be in my city. A local research MD was involved in the Paxil scandal.

    That is not a theory, it's a fact.

    tal

  • Black Sheep
    Black Sheep

    I hope your boxes of baking soda are smaller that our boxes of baking soda, Botz

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvrJT3-VIJ4

  • JeffT
    JeffT

    Let's not forget the medical profession's lack of outcry about the dangers of smoking. For decades. C. Everett Koop changed all that, though. I have a great deal of respect for him because of that.

    Sorry not true.

    The first article linking cigarette use and cancer was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1951.

    http://www.tobacco.org/resources/history/Tobacco_History20-2.html

    In 1952 Reader's Digest published an aritcle intitled "Cancer by the Carton."

    http://www.chantixhome.com/tobacco_factsheet.html

    In the early sixties I was watching movies in jr. high school about the dangers of smoking. Health warnings on cigarette packages were required by a law passed in 1965. http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/2254978 Koop didn't become SG until 1982.

    Given that the first links between smoking and cancer wern't noticed 1930's I don't see this as decades of covering up a known problem. For one thing a world war kind of messed communication.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit