Where is Jehovah?

by His Excellency 121 Replies latest jw friends

  • tec
    tec

    Well, TBH. I heard it said that suffering is man's fault not god's fault.
    Well there's a feckin' get out clause if there was one. Everyone elses fault but Twat-hovah's. No wonder I am more inclined to swing to Satan.

    Who needs a get-out clause? If you are leading a war and beating your fellow man, then that IS your fault, as are the consequences of your actions.

    I say cobblers. If god was such a great entity he would have protected his children. He's done naff all. I look after my bloody boots better than god looks after humanity. It's a joke!

    What if his children are the ones causing the harm to themselves and others because they refuse to listen to him? What should he do then? We are talking about adult children.

    Therefore he is either a capricious, a fatuous disgusting psycho or he doesn't exist.
    I go for non existant.

    Or people do the things He instructed not to do, and don't do the things he says TO do... and then blame him when things don't go as they wanted, or decide that he does not exist.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • tec
    tec

    TEC re my post 1772 about the naughty children, I am dissapointed you chose to not 'get' the simple point there.

    I got the point you were making. It is not an equal analogy, so it does not work.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • tec
    tec

    Satan is supposed to be able to transform himself into an angel of light. He's had so many opportunities to look the hero.

    There is no issue of universal soveriegnty. Satan is not trying to take over. He is trying to prevent us from remaining loyal... or finding... God. The issue is us.

    So transforming into an angel of light.... is something like the wts. (come to me, I have the truth and the life... but this is a lie, and Satan the father of lies) Satan transforming into an angel of light would be making you think that you are following the light... when in reality, he is leading you farther into the darkness.

    The actual light... the actual truth and life... is CHRIST. No one and nothing else.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • Amelia Ashton
    Amelia Ashton

    Searching on the 2012 cd rom I found this

    *** na pp. 17-18 God’s Name and Bible Translators ***

    God’s Name and Bible Translators

    Raymundus Martini used the spelling Yohoua. Soon after, in 1303, Porchetus de Salvaticis completed a work entitled Victoria Porcheti adversus impios Hebraeos (Porchetus’ Victory Against the Ungodly Hebrews). In this he, too, mentioned God’s name, spelling it variously Iohouah, Iohoua and Ihouah. Then, in 1518, Petrus Galatinus published a work entitled De arcanis catholicae veritatis (Concerning Secrets of the Universal Truth) in which he spells God’s name Iehoua.

    The name first appeared in an English Bible in 1530, when William Tyndale published a translation of the first five books of the Bible. In this he included the name of God, usually spelled Iehouah, in several verses, and in a note in this edition he wrote: “Iehovah is God’s name . . . Moreover as oft as thou seist LORD in great letters (except there be any error in the printing) it is in Hebrew Iehovah.” From this the practice arose of using Jehovah’s name in just a few verses and writing “LORD” or “GOD” in most other places where the Tetragrammaton occurs in the Hebrew text.

    What I haven't discovered yet is the reason why the name Jehovah was inserted where it wasn't before in the New Testament

  • tootired2care
    tootired2care

    Do not commit adultery.

    That is pretty straightforward. But how many people disobey this, and then justify it to themselves?

    And how many thousands of years after men lived in caves and groped in ignorance, did it take for this wonderful gem of enlightenment and all the others to be delivered to man? If you believe in god you have to realize that he sat up there and watched men grope in darkness for mellenia, babies starve to death and all kinds of other horrors before he sent a single message. Did he give this message of great enlightenment to all people at once so everyone had equal footing and an equal chance? No, he played favorites and sanctioned a genocide of 25 million men women and children in palestine because he didn't like the way they did things, when he never told them otherwise. Is that a loving thing to do?

    The Bible and the Quran are not God. Nor the Word of God. The bible does not even claim to be... it is even written in there that CHRIST is the Word of God.

    I never said it was.

    Tec - So where did you initially learn about Jesus from? Where do many other people learn about their god from and draw inferences about who he is and what he wants? Is there a talking burning bush somewhere that the majority of mankind missed? oh that's right there isn't one, just a bible, oral traditions and "experts" to interpret those... and the wheels on the bus go round and round.

    Most faiths that I know of, have love and mercy as being the weightier matters of the law

    Without seculism to temper the religious whackos there woud be very little love and mercy, history has already proven that, go check out the history of Christian nations or just look at the current theocratic regimes in the world, it plainly illustrates the horrors that religion is capable of left unchecked.

  • tec
    tec

    And how many thousands of years after men lived in caves and groped in ignorance, did it take for this wonderful gem of enlightenment and all the others to be delivered to man? If you believe in god you have to that he sat up there and watched men grope in darkness,

    babies starve to death and all kinds of other horrors before he sent a single message.

    No, I do not have to believe that. He has always been here, and always spoken.

    Did he give it all people at once so everyone had equal footing and an equal chance?

    Everyone had equal footing and an equal chance... but if some turn away from HIM, and take their children with them, then that is their choice. He did not begin to exist with Israel. Or Isaac. Or Abraham. Or Noah. But from the very beginning.

    No he played favorites and sanctioned a genocide of 25 million men women and children in palestine because he didn't like the way they did things when he never told them otherwise. Is that a loving thing to do?

    'Favorites' might be a loving thing to do... in accordance to those who put faith in you, do as you ask, love you... and so also love those who you love. Over others who perhaps hate you and hate those you love.

    Sanctioning genocide of 25 million men, women and children is not a loving thing to do (though I am not sure what genocide you are speaking of here)... and so you know that he did NOT do it. A) because it is not a loving thing to do, and B) because it is not what Christ did... and Christ is the Image and Truth of God. Not the Israelites, not the bible, not any religion before or after Him.

    (Also God promised Abraham that Ishmael would also be a great nation.)

    Tec - So where did you initially learn about Jesus from? Where do many other people learn about their god from and draw inferences about who he is and what he wants? Is there a talking burning bush somewhere that the majority of mankind missed? oh that's right

    there isn't one, just a bible, oral traditions and "experts" to interpret those... and the wheels on the bus go round and round.

    I learned about Jesus initially from other people telling me. Then much later in my life, I continued to learn about Him from the gospels (much later as in a handful of years ago). Which themselves point to CHRIST, and not the bible. From learning about Christ, I learned about God... and only from Christ. Most everything i thought I knew before that was wrong, because I was listening to religion and other people, and NOT Christ.

    I only know Christ though (as opposed to knowing about him) by going to Him, and listening and hearing him, in spirit. He is alive, and He does speak. Many people do not know (have forgotten) or do not have the faith TO hear Him and follow His voice. But His sheep hear His voice. He is written to have said that they would, and His words have proven true, at least to all those who do hear him.

    Now, I don't need to explore about what others teach about Him (except to speak sometimes against the lies they can teach that turn people away from Him).

    But I do not have to worry about their teachings... because I can listen to Him, and understand truth from HIM.

    Without seculism to temper the religious whackos there woud be very little love and mercy history has already proven that, and just look at the current theocratic regimes in the world and it plainly illustrates what religion is capable of left unchecked.

    We're talking apples and oranges here.

    God and Christ... are NOT religion. Religion belongs to man. Religion is man trying to make physical and 'without', something that is spiritual and within. Religion is man walking by sight, rather than walking by faith.

    Though even if we were speaking solely about religion, religion has done good as well as bad for people. Such as those social programs and charities, etc. If those were suddenly gone, that would be a lot of people left abandoned. There are not enouch secular 'forces' to pick up that slack.

    The religious 'whackos' might be the loudest, but they are not often the majority.

    Did you read that article last year where a group of muslims stood as a shield around a group of christians during their worship, to protect them from the extremists, or to die with them?

    Peace,

    tammy

  • cofty
    cofty

    How would the world look any different if this chatty god of yours didn't exist Tammy?

  • tootired2care
    tootired2care

    I learned about Jesus initially from other people telling me.

    Very convenient...and where do you suppose they learned about Jesus from?

    Sanctioning genocide of 25 million men, women and children is not a loving thing to do (though I am not sure what genocide you are speaking of here)... and so you know that he did NOT do it. A) because it is not a loving thing to do, and B) because it is not what Christ did... and Christ is the Image and Truth of God. Not the Israelites, not the bible, not any religion before or after Him.

    It's interesting that Christ made many references to the OT in his written account, by doing this he showed that he believed it to be fact. Of all those references I don't recall anywhere where he condemned the Israelites for following gods command to cleanse palestine of all the 'filthy' non-israelites pagan nations (the genocide) to make way for the "promised land flowing with milk and honey". Jesus was up in heaven and watched the whole thing happen and did nothing to prevent it, nor did he condemn it when he was on earth. Silence is consent, and Jesus is just as much to blame as the Israelites for that massacre, if not more because he had the power to stop it.

    God and Christ... are NOT religion. Religion belongs to man. Religion is man trying to make physical and 'without', something that is spiritual and within. Religion is man walking by sight, rather than walking by faith.

    Religion is a belief system and whether you like to admit it or not you've got yourself your own little religion there.

  • tec
    tec

    Very convenient...and where do you suppose they learned about Jesus from?

    Initially? Probably from others. How do you think men and women learned about him before there was a bible handy, or gospels?

    People witnessed TO Christ. Those who knew him firsthand in the flesh; those who heard of him and came to know Him in the spirit.

    I am not discounting the bible. But the bible is just another 'witness' pointing to Christ. It is not Christ, himself.

    It's interesting that Christ made many references to the OT in his written account, by doing this he showed that he believed it to be fact.

    This is an assumption. A couple of assumptions actually. That a) referencing occurrances in the past means that He believed everything written was both infallable AND true AND from God. But this cannot be true, since in the OT, there are references to 'lying pen of the scribes has handled the law falsely', and Christ, Himself is written to have said 'woe to you scribes'.

    If they had the truth, then there would have been no need for THE Truth to come and teach. So if you want to know the truth, then look to Christ. Not the OT.

    Of all those references I don't recall anywhere where he condemned the Israelites for following gods command to cleanse palestine of all the 'filthy' non-israelites pagan nations (the genocide) to make way for the "promised land flowing with milk and honey".

    I still don't know what you are talking about here.

    Peace,

    tammy

  • tec
    tec

    Religion is a belief system and whether you like to admit it or not you've got yourself your own little religion there.

    I do not have my own little religion going anywhere. I am following Christ, and no more than that.

    If it helps to distinguish though... we can refer to religion as organized religion. With doctrines, and rules, and rites, and rituals, and visible leaders, etc.

    I have none of those. I am just another finger pointing to Christ.

    Peace,

    tammy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit