JWB:
This new kingdom was not dubbed "Jehovah's Kingdom" by the early Christian writers. The GB use the preaching of their particular brand of 'good news' as proof that one is a true Christian.
The GB are not interested in portraying or following Jesus; Jesus questioned religious authority, the GB can’t have that.
AND Jesus ATE with sinners, tax collectors, whores; that puts in perspective talking to someone who doesn’t go to the kingdom hall anymore, right? If Jesus could survive a meal with outcasts, why can’t JW’s, SO strong in their faith, have a word with a faded relative?
WHO are these wicked wicked apostates anyway??
This is so over the top, I agree that it will do more damage than good.
It is obvious that the GB does not get why membership is flat or declining; their lack of leadership and the appalling poor quality of writing, not to mention the CONSTANT tampering with doctrine. Oh, and they led everyone to think they didn’t need college, didn’t need retirement savings, the new system would take care of that.
They think it must be those who have left that are doing the damage; GB, look in the mirror. If you had compelling doctrine, and allowed congregations to do the things real fellowships do, you would be gaining members. Even the Mormons, who still believe that American Indians are the lost tribes, aren’t doing as bad as the witnesses.
So in this talk, which I think should be somehow made public, the apostates are compared to Satan, demons, they are called wicked, they are compared to the family addict.
First of all, does this remind you of that old saying, when you don’t have the law or the facts on your side, attack the source?
And for them to reference addiction counselors and behavior therapists is the absolute ultimate in hypocrisy; the WT HATES those guys. Until 1983 they condemned AA type programs as being religious in nature, not allowed for witnesses. They say the Lord’s prayer there, you know, can’t have that!! Better to stay in active addiction and listen to the WT that tells you it is a moral weakness, better to continue ruining your family, but for God’s sake don’t go to AA!
So now not wanting to go to the kingdom hall anymore is the same as being a meth addict, a heroin addict, a chronic alcoholic??
Let’s follow that reasoning: addiction, as viewed by the SAME counselors they reference, is an inborn thing, it is a disease that can be treated; addicts have a different makeup and are susceptible to addiction.
So if apostates are like addicts, they were born that way, it is not their fault. Their recovery or relapse, obviously, is their responsibility.
And the family is encouraged to be involved in SUPPORT for the addict who enters treatment; does the GB want us to be involved in the lives of apostates?
Clearly, evidently, the GB did not think this one through. I wonder about those in the audience who have had family members in treatment; what will they think of this dunderheaded talk??