Recent Global Cooling Controversy

by metatron 236 Replies latest jw friends

  • mP
    mP

    I would like to remind you that in the 1970s scientists also told us we were entering a time of global cooling. I guess some cant decide. These same scientsts referred to the same graphs

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling

    Global cooling was a conjecture during the 1970s of imminent cooling of the Earth's surface and atmosphere culminating in a period of extensiveglaciation. This hypothesis had little support in the scientific community, but gained temporary popular attention due to a combination of a slight downward trend of temperatures from the 1940s to the early 1970s and press reports that did not accurately reflect the full scope of the scientific climate literature,

    Even the same press reported it to some extent. Its not a one day story from one pseudo scientist. It had some backing. Im not claiming all but it had enough to be reasonably popular. Again popularity in the media is not proof of anything.

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    mP:

    bah just a typo

    mP claims it was "just a typo" that he consistently typed besty's username as "betsy", yet up to that point he had not typed it correctly even once in the entire thread. I don't buy it.

    Back on topic, mP trawls out the usual attempts to simplify climate change. He clearly did not watch - or did not understand - the video I posted early in this thread.

  • mP
    mP

    jeffro:

    Back on topic, mP trawls out the usual attempts to simplify climate change. He clearly did not watch - or did not understand - the video I posted early in this thread

    mP:

    Good thing you can never talk specifics, its always bland sweeping statements.

    I asked about the changing temps over the past 5000 years, but you skipped that. I asked for examples of real change from gov and you gave garbage collection in sweden was one of two that you could find. You made assumptions about germany's solar and wind program and completely ignored the fact they changed for strategic reasons which i went into limited detail.

    I havent simplified climate change. i have expanded the discussed. Your the one who simplifies because the best you can do is focus on one thing. When i ask simple q you run away.

    When are you going to address those replies, or have the kids that do your home work at school gone to toilet again ?

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    mP:

    Can you actually contribute on something thats a little more intelligent than the gutter that you woke up from. Clean that shit off your face and change your flee infested clothes, get an education and then come back here. I would also suggest that you hang out with some of the kids at your school that have progressed from painting with shite from their pants and hang out with the smart kids.

    Idiot.

  • mP
    mP

    Jeffro:

    Yet again another post filled with insults. At best y9ou have made one attempt at actually linking to something worth looking at, the remainder of your replies are garbage. And yes i did write that up, then i thought i wont lower myself to your three brain cell level.

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    mP:

    I asked about the changing temps over the past 5000 years, but you skipped that.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC_2WXyORGA

    Keep watching the damned video until you understand the subject a little better. That's if you bothered to watch it the first time. I'm not doing your homework for you.

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    mP:

    Can you actually contribute on something thats a little more intelligent than the gutter that you woke up from. Clean that shit off your face and change your flee infested clothes, get an education and then come back here. I would also suggest that you hang out with some of the kids at your school that have progressed from painting with shite from their pants and hang out with the smart kids.
    When are you going to address those replies, or have the kids that do your home work at school gone to toilet again ?
    Yet again another post filled with insults. At best y9ou have made one attempt at actually linking to something worth looking at, the remainder of your replies are garbage. And yes i did write that up, then i thought i wont lower myself to your three brain cell level.

    Oh, the irony. Idiot.

  • mP
    mP

    So why is it different this time round ? Lets hear it for everyone else in a few words.

    I prefer text because its easy to read and quote, videos are a bit harder and not quite as easy to quote.

    Surely a wizard like yourself can type a paragraph. I wnt you to type the text here, so i can reply here in writing.

  • besty
    besty

    @mP

    These changes happened without factories and cars. Please tell me whats the difference between them and today.

    If you accept CO2 is a greenhouse gas and that higher concentrations of CO2 make for a warmer planet, then it should be obvious to you that human activity increasing the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases by 40% in the last few hundred years will make a significant change to the climate.

    Is there anything in the above statement you disagree with?

  • mP
    mP

    besty:

    The graph just a few responses above quite clearly shows it was hotter 10k -3k years ago and then another rise about 1000 years ago.

    Dont tell me about grreenhouses gases address this.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit