To my knowledge, the mother knew the following- the husband was in the other woman's home. The mother KNEW her husband was there cheating (if not actually in the act),
-------
Again. We have no way of knowing what was seen.
You have said more than once that the woman knew her husband was having an affair with a woman who lived in that house - you admit that the woman couldn't have known the husband was actually having sex. That means the intent to force a child to watch sex was not the motive when she went to the house - it may have been a by product of her actions but it is clear it wasn't the intent.
There is a major difference between intent to sexually exploit a child by taking them into home with the sole purpose of exposing them to this action and bringing a child into adult conflict ie verbal confrontation and then accidentally walking in on someone doing something - that could be anything from drinking or taking drugs or dealing in weapons - all which would be a negative impact on a child.
Major difference.
Sorry if you can't comprehend that.
If you believe the mother is guilty of sexual exploitation, if you believe that she knew the exact time and place a sex act was going to occur and that she purposely took her child to that place to expose him to that act, then you should contact the police if you live in a State where there is no statute of limitations. This may mean bringing the father into the picture because if someone opens your door and you keep having sex knowing you are on display, as it seems you infer the father was doing, then there are more than a few people that could be charged with exploitation. sammieswife