Thought Experiments and Bill Bowen (page 2)

hawkaw

Dear Hilda,

You are the one promoting that its okay for the WTS to protect it's ass rather than the a__es of its little kids who were abused under it's care.

And that is no thought experiment.

hawk

MikeMusto

As painful as it is....black spandex is no myth

HildaBingen

Dear hawk:

You are the one who cannot tell the difference between a thought experiment and reality, dear. I love my white brothers and sisters. She who is in Christ is my brother or sister.

And the WT is not trying to protect itself. It loves children and has a policy designed to protect children. Those who molest children in the WT are punished.

hawkaw

Wrong - its loves itself as a corporation and no one else.

The facts in the Erica case and many more like them completely disagree with your "opinion".You probably enjoy the fact that little kids are getting sexually abused.

The facts from insiders in Bethal who have come forward such as Barb Anderson speak volumes.

You really like this - watching little kids get it and then defending your organization over them - I must say you are one sick science experiment.

hawk

hawkaw

Oh!!!

BTW - I wasn't talking race bigotry Hilda, I was telling you that you practice "creed" bigotry - which is just as sick.

hawk

HildaBingen

Dear hawk:

I love the subjectivity parading around as objectivity in this place.

:The facts from insiders in Bethal who have come forward such as Barb Anderson speak volumes.:

What Barb anderson says may or may not be true. But this ol' gal has lived long enough to know that one cannot put faith in everything heard. It may suit your purposes to believe what Ms Anderson says without any evidence. But that does not mean those of us who are wise have to believe what she says without appropriate warrant.

:You really like this - watching little get it and then defending your organization over them - I must say you are one sick science experiment.:

Are logical fallacies endemic to this board? Detesting lies, misrepresentation and exaggerations does not entail approving of child molestation, hon. Where did you take logic?

You again miss the point about the experiment. A thought experiment is not a science experiment. It is just what it sounds like, accounting for the presence of absence. It is a "thought" experiment designed to make you take your blinders off.

HildaBingen

:BTW - I wasn't talking race bigotry Hilda, I was telling you that you practice "creed" bigotry - which is just as sick.:

I think my comments were addressed to out, who also failed to understand what I was doing.

Besides I do not practice creed bigotry. I do not even believe in creeds.

hawkaw

Say any thing to get out of the fact that you shun people and label people and of course say anything so that sickos can continue to abuse little kids.

Sick I tell you - you are one sick person.

hawk

Frenchy

Well, that went over well! (smile)

HildaBingen

:Say any thing to get out of the fact that you shun people and label people and of course say anything so that sickos can continue to abuse little kids.:

Let's see. How many logical fallacies do we have here? Is outright lying a logical fallacy? Probably not. But that is what someone is doing now. I go by the NT, dear. If it tells me to disassociate myself from the "wicked man" then that is what I will do (1 Corinthians 5:9-13).

I try to avoid labeling people. What labels did you have in mind?

I also hate pedophilia and the act of sickos abusing children in any way. What gave you the idea that I approve of such acts? Who is the sicko in this place? Your logic needs some serious work, dear. Disapproving of A does not entail that one approves of B.

:Sick I tell you - you are one sick person.:

I am not alone. It looks like you need some work done in the pathology area yourself, doc.

Thought Experiments and Bill Bowen

Share this