Snare & Racket I for one do rarely google and definitely do not copy and paste at all. I like original, if unconventional ideas and have 6 figure payment to my credit for certified and applied novel concepts.
Your good suggestion to get an education is well meant and I would be at it, if I believed that further SPECIALIZED learning would bolster my understanding of general science much, and pushing 90, I do not need the good path you took to get an educted income carreer; congrats on that again.
I do not believe anything I have said conflicts with knowledge, science as it is published today. to the contrary often eager poster had their facts wrong. binary star systems, nono- or dimensions. as recent examples.
My views are not religiously dominated, I am distanced (not phisically out) for purely intellectual reasons. I reserve my emtions for family and the arts.
I wish the debate would get down to the dimensions, small and great, and the models that help us to understand, visualize them, and even get insights and
make predictions. and the opening post title:
BIRTH of the universe steered the thinking in the creationist direction like:
birth? where is the FATHER? for we have the mother !! nature, and nurture
better minds than mine have written that these waves, moving, interfering or stationary could extend further back into time than we now know as I read in the economist, new scientist. but the interest is in our past, our domain.