Objectivity and This Site

by Eutapro 76 Replies latest jw friends

  • Xander
    Xander

    And, maybe, just a little...

    _ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    _ | \ _ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    \| |\/ ^^^^^^^^^^^
    mm^ \/_/ ^mm ^^^^^^
    | / / \ \ | /^^^
    \ \ ( X X ) / / ||| _,.-'^.
    \ \ \---/ / / / /| _,.-'^ }
    \ \ \_/ / / // |/ _,.-'@@@@ }
    \ \_-^ ^-_/ / ||/|\ _,.-'^ @@@@@ _,.-'
    | ,, | \|_,.-'^ @@@@.-'^
    \ *##* / *## _,.-'^
    | *##* | *### _,.-'^
    | '' | *##_,.-'^
    |-_____-| __ . . __ . .
    / \ | | | | | | |\ |
    | _-_ | |-- | | |__/ | \ | ,
    / / \ \ |__| |__| | \ | \| /
    | | | | __ __ __ __ . .
    / / \ \ | | | | | | |
    | | | | | |__/ | | | |
    _/ / \ \_ | | \ |__| |__ |__
    {____} {____} Yeah, I know, feeding a troll. But, I felt like having some fun with ASCII art today, so....

    Xander F
    (Unseen Apostate Directorate of North America - Ohio order)

    A fanatic is one who, upon losing sight of his goals, redoubles his efforts.
    --George Santayana

  • Hyghlandyr
    Hyghlandyr

    Eutapro,

    For goodness sake. (Yes not a critical thinking statement but I had to say it) I am with you dude. And the fact that you make these statements and then are called a troll simply demonstrate that you can take the apostate out of the JWs but you cant take the JWs out of the apostate.

    I have stated before that some people just ARE Jehovahs Witnesses. It is not something they do, it is something they are. They continue to be in the thinking mold of the witnesses long after they leave. Or perhaps it is more accurate to say that many people simply do not have incredibly well developed critical thinking skills. I will state I think that applies to the sctientific community as well.

    Each group, Jehovah's Witnesses, Ex Jehovahs Witnesses, Scientists, Christians, Atheists, and so on, have the same pattern. While it is true that some groups and some individuals within those groups have more freedom, or more open mindedness, or more facts to support their claims, all of these still eventually react the same. That which supports their agenda, or belief, or need is accepted. That which does not is often reject. The standard is not the same then. Usually that which is evidence contrary to the belief, is held to a stricter set of standards than that agrees with the belief.

    You are called a troll. I see that term fly around here so often. Troll is the Online-Ex-Witness version of the Witness term "Worldly." That term has other variations depending on the group you are a part of, Nazi, Feminazi, Samaritan, Pharisee, are some examples. All of these are a variety of ad hominem, which evoke a feeling in the reader. Thus, if the writer can evoke that feeling, apply it to the person he is disagreeing with, readers will then dismiss the person in question, rather than examine their arguements.

    Not only is troll often used, but so to is the method of accusing one person of being another. You have a certain pattern of speech, you say certain words use certain phrases. So does another. You must therefore be that person. Well you may be I do not know. I do not care. I will evaluate your statements on their own basis.

    =========

    Ok so you do have a point. You came here expecting mostly witnesses or at least a mixture and it is all ex witnesses. Perhaps it would have been more 'honest' to call it exjw.com. However, another thing to think about is that there are many here that are witnesses. Does being one of Jehovah's Witnesses require that you accept all of their teachings and claims? The Watchtowr says it does. But most witnesses do not think so. Most witnesses will disagree with this or that, and demonstrate it by their actions. So too a catholic might believe in birth control. Just because the leaders say you have to not believe in it in order to be catholic, does not make the person not catholic.

    So there are many witnesses that come here and do so secretely. Some of the things they agree with, many or most they do not. There is a lot of dissention within their organization right now. More and more of them are getting fed up with the ever tightening grip of the leadership arrangement. But they still believe the core doctrines, no trinity, no hell fire, no immortal soul, etc. Also a great many lurk and never post. I have received emails from such persons. Hey its their bag I dont mind.

    Of course if a witness were running a forum, in most cases, not all, you could expect him to prevent exes from posting. And perhaps even remove posts from the forum that are by actives and yet are dissenting. In addition to this the reality is that there are ways of tracking people online. Should a witness post, they may fear being discovered and excommunicated. Shunned.

    The long and the short of that is that theonly reason the JWs are not posting, is by their own choice. There are many of them in the United States and Ive seen and chatted with plenty of them on yahoo. But they wont come to this forum in most cases when I invite them. I cuss, very vehemently. I talk about the org. I talk about child molestation. I call the org a devil possessed institution. I am brutal over there. I have been far more gentle coming here because many of the folks here simply do not have the strength to bear me. Yet the witnesses there talk to me. Despite my antics. And though I am probably the worst thing they can run across from the perspective of a witness, they talk to be yet refuse to come to these forums. Why? I dont ask. I dont make them do anything. I am, while vile, laid back. I dont tell them to leave and I dont chide them for their belief. Perhaps that is why.

    But as to the possible dishonesty in the name of this site. I am glad for it. I do not think I am required to speak truth at every moment. The emotional damage that is caused by high control groups like the witnesses is intense for many of their followers. If a little domain name lie as is 'told' here, or on http://quotes.jehovahswitnesses.com/ does for others what it did for me, opens their eyes, then I wont complain too much.

    As to the comments made about you I would simply ignore them. I usually do about myself.

    Except I would like to point out a couple of things. Ignorance is what everyone has. It simply means lack of knowledge. Someone may be an intellectual, or run in those circles, and not know everything about JWs. If they did know, we would not have to warn them would we?

    Second, I think I stated most of it at the beginning of my post. Is there a need to be crying troll troll troll at every turn? Why not just respond to the questions, answer them, and move on. Or why not instead just admit there is a little JW hypocrisy in us all and we all like name calling. Then lets go over to the Adults and Disagreement forum, and hurl ad hominems at each other. Insulting folks is a particularly Irish skill, and if it is done well, earns the insulter great respect. But in Irish you could not insult someone by calling them a troll, or jerk, or moron, or any of the various curse words that can fill in because such words just dont exist in that form. Now you have to say something interesting to insult them.

    Hope to see you post in the future Eutapro, even if you are someone else. Or not:)

  • Hyghlandyr
    Hyghlandyr

    Another point. I am glad you posted because it got me thinking about something else.

    I see so many people here chiding the witnesses for merely being here. Threatening them. Insisting that they leave. That they are not allowed to be here.

    AHHHHHHHHH!

    That is TYPICAL JW thinking. That is NOT the thinking of the average person. So when an ex tells me that they are an ex but continues giving people a hassle for reading or posting in this forum are they really an ex?

    And the excuse that, well they could be DFed for being here, isnt it true that one of our greatest objections to JWs is the practice of shunning. Especially the manner in which it is practiced? So then why should we even infer someone would or should be dfed for being here. We should welcome them here. Argue and debate with them. Tell them what is on our minds. But GET THE DUB BLOOD out of our veins if we are going to continue to tell them how bad they are.

    btw I just registered that statement-Get the DUB BLOOD out of your veins™ as a trademark. No one else may use it without my express written permission. All rights to it are reserved.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    Hyghlandyr: Well put! I agree 100% I am DAed and enjoy posts from all viewpoints......

  • larc
    larc

    Eutapro,

    Let me try to respond to you in a calm rational way, as you have requested.

    You said that you are interested in the effects of classical conditioning within certain religions. It would seem to me, that classical conditioning would play a significant role in some religions, but not much within the JWs. I think operant conditioning would be a much more significant factor for the JWs.

    Since you say you are interested in this subject, what you have learned to date, in this regard. Related to this, can you please provide peer reviewed articles on the effects of classical conditioning within religion? Also, can you provide the same such articles on any subject as the apply specificly to the Witnesses?

    I will be interested in your comments.

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    I may have this wrong, but I understand that Simon started this site as a place for JW's to meet, since he was still a JW, himself.

    To reiterate someone elses comments (Xander?) - an informed JW is an ex-JW (or very likely to soon become one).

    As for EU - don't you just love pseudo-intellectuals?

  • Jewel
    Jewel

    So would classical conditioning be like when I see certain kinds of bookbags or briefcases I STILL start to feel car sick??? (I was ALWAYS sent out to the rurals...)

    Jewel

  • Spartacus
    Spartacus

    "But objectivity and openness are important for us intellectual academics."

    Yeah right, Eutapro had to pat himself on the back, who cares!

    JW's are a bunch of damn fools, how bout that for objectivity?

    Your Science project is concluded.

  • radar
    radar

    Hyghlandyr

    Appreciate your post, you make some good points. I am glad you brought this up.

    You said in part..
    ______________________________________________________________________
    You are called a troll. I see that term fly around here so often. Troll is the Online-Ex-Witness version of the Witness term "Worldly."
    .......................... Thus, if the writer can evoke that feeling, apply it to the person he is disagreeing with, readers will then dismiss the person in question, rather than examine their arguements.
    ______________________________________________________________________

    This is similar to what I have been saying in my posts recently, including to Simon.
    I find though that you hit a brick wall with most here on the subject.

  • orangefatcat
    orangefatcat

    This is for sure that number one troll broom Hilda.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit