Pragmatism is the best you can do. You wouldnt receive any presents to enjoy your Pints in a special festive sort of way if it was not for the Christian Church and Christian Theism. What you reject and what you despise is gives the occasion for presents and special bottles of Ale that we all enjoy. When you enjoy your gifts and down you Pints you are basically giving the middle finger to your atheistic world view. If I was a true and consistent atheist, which you are not, I would call you a sell out for celebrating Christmas.
You really don't get it, do you? Atheism is not a religion. I don't have atheistic principles. I simply do not believe in gods. That's it. That's what defines me as an atheist. To be a "true and consistent atheist" all I have to do is not believe in any sort of god under any circumstances. That's all. There's no "atheist agenda" or "atheist code".
I completely agree that without the dominance of Christianity, we would not be celebrating Christmas (probably Yule or Saturnalia), the same as without the dominance of the British Empire we would not all be speaking English. But despite my opposition to British imperialism, I speak their language. Perhaps it's the same sort of pragmatism that led the church to adopt the pagan wintertime celebrations and most of their trappings.
Maybe consistency is the problem, maybe atheism can't give an account for consistency since the atheistic world view is so internally inconsistent. Maybe that is why atheist are so woefully inconsistent when they borrow capitol from the Theistic Christian World View and Celebrate Christmas
How is atheism "internally inconsistent"? I understand that you believe there is a god, and therefore believe atheism is wrong, but how is it
internally inconsistent? The entire "atheistic world view" can be summed up as: "There are no gods". I don't understand how you think that is self-contradictory. Please explain.
Atheism is not for the intelligent, its a lazy philosophical and religious system for those who are bitter and angry with God for some inane reason.
That's exactly what I accused you of, not believing that people are really atheists. You can't conceive how someone could come to the conclusion that there are no gods, so rather than trying to understand it, you think that we're angry with your god and just pretend not to believe in it.
It is a system that doopes it's victims into thinking that they are wise when atheism presents itself as a paper tiger that is easily crumbled at the slightest of rigorous cross examination
You think so? OK then,
bring it on!