The recent popularizing of the 1919 Faithful & Discreet wt Slave shows me, that for now, they want to keep that era in focus. , regardless of the fact that there prediction, doctrines of those times were absolutely wrong.
How Will They End 1914 Teaching?
by EmptyInside 282 Replies latest watchtower bible
-
-
sloppyjoe2
waton15 hours ago
The generation that does not pass away
from reddit by sloppyjoe2
wt prophecy like that would be a falseprophecy , because in Math.24 there is no such generation that does not pass away. They all pass away. The generation talked about will pass away after all these things have occurred. These things (listed prior to Math: 24:34) includes a disaster bigger than the flood in noah's day (from the world's beginning).
Even current wt doctrine about the anointed generation is false, because the wt generation does not pass away after, (as Jesus said), but before the full Great Tribulation i.e. Armageddon.
Armageddon, the tribulation greater than the Flood, which clearly happened after the worlds beginning, is the biggy, not just a mere "sign". It is a signing out of 99% of all beings.
@waton I have no dog in the fight. Being false or not, the question is what will the watchtower do with their current teaching. The Reddit post is but one solution. Witnesses will believe whatever they’re told to believe, true or false.
-
scholar
Jeffro
The assignment of 586 BCE is based on Thiele from the 1940s. 586 is still frequently parroted, but modern scholarship, particularly after the publication of BM21946, favours 587 BCE.
---
Prove it. I have a copy of BM 21946 so list the reasons for your stupid claim and I will argue that this tablet proves 607 BCE rather than 587 BCE
scholar JW
-
Jeffro
🤦♂️
’scholar’:
Prove it. I have a copy of BM 21946 so list the reasons for your stupid claim and I will argue that this tablet proves 607 BCE rather than 587 BCE
Huh? The tablet confirms the placement of the first siege in early 597 BCE, and other additional information from the Bible confirms the destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. BM 21946 does not itself confirm the year of Jerusalem’s destruction at all. But feel free to present your trite case for this idiotic claim that you can prove 607 from BM 21946. 😂
And the tablet also contradicts the Watch Tower Society’s interpretation of the events in the early part of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign.
-
scholar
Jeffro
Huh? The tablet confirms the placement of the first siege in early 597 BCE, and other additional information from the Bible confirms the destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. BM 21946 does not itself confirm the year of Jerusalem’s destruction at all. But feel free to present your trite case for this idiotic claim that you can prove 607 from BM 21946. 😂
---
You first made the claim that BM 21946 supports 587 BCE rather than 607 BCE then list your reasons for this and provide the specific verses .
---
And the tablet also contradicts the Watch Tower Society’s interpretation of the events in the early part of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign.
---
I await your explanation for this statement.
scholar JW
-
Jeffro
I owe you no explanations. Several threads on this forum are awaiting responses from you. You previously repeatedly refused to address them.
I have already provided information confirming 587 BCE is the correct year based on details in the Bible and the known chronology of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign.
-
scholar
Jeffro
I owe you no explanations. Several threads on this forum are awaiting responses from you. You previously repeatedly refused to address the
--
Huh! Running scared for you make bold statements and refuse to back them up.
---
I have already provided information confirming 587 BCE is the correct year based on details in the Bible and the known chronology of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign.
---
No. All that you have provided is your interpretation. Your information amounts to a contrivance in order to mislead your readers by means of pretty coloured charts which are simply a rehash of Carl Jonsson's thesis and Adventist criticism of WT chronology from Australia beginning in the sixties.
scholar JW
-
Longlivetherenegades
The moment @ Scholar stated "the Bible chronology" I 😂😂😂😂😂😂.
Where in the Bible can you show me word for word Chislev 1st 607 BCE. Where?😎
-
scholar
Longlivetherenegades
Where in the Bible can you show me word for word Chislev 1st 607 BCE. Where?😎
---
I can't. You have trumped the mighty scholar!
scholar JW
-
Jeffro
Longlivetherenegades:
Where in the Bible can you show me word for word Chislev 1st 607 BCE. Where?😎
No need to go that far. He can’t even show the verse that say ‘70 years of exile’ 😂