Jeffro
No need to go that far. He can’t even show the verse that say ‘70 years of exile’ 😂
---
You cannot even show a verse that say '70 years of Babylon's domination'
scholar JW
by EmptyInside 282 Replies latest watchtower bible
Jeffro
No need to go that far. He can’t even show the verse that say ‘70 years of exile’ 😂
---
You cannot even show a verse that say '70 years of Babylon's domination'
scholar JW
I don't think there is any way they can remove or rescind the 1914 theology without the Borg collapsing in on itself like a straw house.
Because,,,without the 1914 premise, theology 1918 or 1919 could not be founded as the IBSA being chosen when Boozerford was president.
Probably the fallacy of 1914 will be mentioned less, less, more less and just faded and fizzled out so it's forgotten about.
Because, when you think about it,,,,how else does the Borg promote it's own theology?
They have to use the same nonsense repeated over and over and over again so the sheeple believe nonsense.
Recent youtubers have pointed-out this. They mention the Borg uses certain words multiple times in WT studies and talks for 'words' and phrases to ''stick'' in the sheeples minds.
They can't just dump 1914 outright cold. It'll like just fade and die out and be forgotten.
Being false or not, the question is what will the watchtower do
sloppy joe, what wt does might depend on whether the doctrines, prophecies are proven true or not.
about the 1914 generation, they might want to get rid of the "anointing",or the "never dying" not mentioned in the text, or the extended overlap,thus killing 2 stones with one bird.
‘scholar’:
You cannot even show a verse that say '70 years of Babylon's domination'
🤦♂️
Jeffro
Poor ‘scholar’, addled by years of the Watch Tower Society misrepresenting the Bible, can’t understand what ‘all the nations serving Babylon’ means. The context of 70 years of all the nations serving Babylon is quite clear, and Jeremiah’s description of the ‘yoke’ even more so.
Even the Watch Tower Society’s own Isaiah commentary recognises that it is 70 years of Babylon’s dominance. 😂
Poor pitiful ‘scholar’.
The level of hair-splitting required to deny the 70 years of domination claim is staggering. If your standard is "the exact wording*," then it should be applied to any claims in this topic, in which case the Bible doesn't say anything about any of the claims, right?
*(Or even better, the exact wording in English!)
As has happened with all previous failed JW predictions, once WT scrubs all talk about 1914, the "sheep" will simply refer to the concept with labels such as:
"our publications used to teach"
"outdated understanding"
"an adjustment"
... and JWS will, for the most part, including the Scholar, accept it, forget it, and move on to chasing whatever other carrot the GB dangles in front of them.
- Ha Ha . None of the above contains a verse -70 years of Babylon's domination as requested.
- scholar JW
Astounding.
Gave Scholar the benefit of the doubt, but after this, he is just another troll....