What evidence is there for a biblical jesus?

by Touchofgrey 189 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    peacefulpete:

    The last section of book of Daniel was reinterpreted as referring to Rome prior to Christian usage.

    Of course. Christianity didn’t start in a vacuum. But the key word is ‘reinterpreted’. When the original apocalyptic hopes in Daniel failed after the Maccabean period, it was reinterpreted. Just as Christians reinterpreted their end times beliefs after Jesus didn’t return within a generation.

  • joey jojo
    joey jojo

    FreetheMasons, I'm not sure if you are new here, or posting with a new account. With respect, you are simply paraphrasing selected bible passages that you believe to have some kind of meaning in 2024.

    This board is full of people that lived a majority of their lives as JW's and have heard all of this before. Since leaving the org, a lot of those same people have studied the Bible in great detail - including the inconvenient parts of the bible they don't talk about much at the meetings.

    All you seem to be saying is, ' the bible said it- that settles it'. That's not good enough if you want to be taken seriously.

  • FreeTheMasons
    FreeTheMasons

    @joeyjojo -

    If I cared more about what people think than about what Jehovah thinks, I'd still be in the JWborg now.

    You seem to care more about impressing people than truth, which is why you value "being taken seriously" more than I do.

    Are you a former JW elder?

  • Beth Sarim
    Beth Sarim

    Being in JW dot boring is allllllll llllll about pleasing people & keeping people happy.

    Once you get over that hurdles/ obstacle ....its. .

    Allll good. Its just people thats all

  • FreeTheMasons
    FreeTheMasons

    That's not good enough if you want to be taken seriously.

    How's the third line of this song go, @joey jojo, do ya know?😜

    its 😎🍺

    Allll good. Its just people thats all

    Amen, @BethSarim! Jesus hung out with people - he didn't care what the freakin Pharisees thought...cheers to you, @BethSarim - having a cold one right now - may you have an awesome evening, my friend🫶😁

    https://youtu.be/4w8wcmZQ-pc?si=SOCPx846AI8H6uJQ

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    Vidqun:

    Jeffro, it's a case of the pot is calling the kettle black. I have clearly demonstrated your irrationality by you insinuating "destroy" means "corrupt," in order for you to fit it into your brand of theology.

    Notice this common apologist tactic… personalise the issue and falsely imply that some novel interpretation is being asserted. Back in reality, the fact that the book of Daniel is about the Maccabean period is the mainstream view in biblical scholarship.

  • truthlover123
    truthlover123

    We need more Garth Brooks! No more politics, just music

  • joey jojo
    joey jojo
    FreeTheMasons
    @joeyjojo -
    If I cared more about what people think than about what Jehovah thinks, I'd still be in the JWborg now.
    You seem to care more about impressing people than truth, which is why you value "being taken seriously" more than I do.
    Are you a former JW elder?

    No. In my 30 - ish years as a born in jw I never 'reached out'. Never an elder or m.s. - I didnt even auxilliary pioneer once.

    Im not a fan of Garth Brooks or country music, so I dont know the song you are referring to, but thanks for dedicating it to me.

    Enjoy your beer- I wish i was drinking one right now.

  • TonusOH
    TonusOH

    FreeTheMasons: For the same reason Herod saw him in a negative light - they didn't want to lose their power and control over people.

    Even though they knew he was divine?

    I asked the question to point out a flaw in the argument that the apostles would not have died for a fraud. We can point out this flaw in other ways, such as the claim that the Jewish priests --who were waiting on the Messiah-- would reject a man who performed miracles and spoke in a way that left people amazed. If people can act in an irrational manner, why not the apostles who supposedly preferred martyrdom? If their actions only make sense in the context of an actual god in their midst, how does that explain his rejection by the priests? Because they wanted something that they knew they would lose anyway? That doesn't make sense.

    This sort of selective interpretation might be excused if it happens once, or if it can be explained away in a coherent manner. But this is typical of the Bible-- it is interpreted many different ways and inconsistencies and problems like the one described above are ignored or handwaved. After a while, it's not hard to understand what is happening-- we interpret it to suit our beliefs. This, in itself, is a flaw.

  • FreeTheMasons
    FreeTheMasons
    @JoeyJoJo said: FreetheMasons, I'm not sure if you are new here, or posting with a new account. With respect, you are simply paraphrasing selected bible passages that you believe to have some kind of meaning in 2024.

    This board is full of people that lived a majority of their lives as JW's and have heard all of this before. Since leaving the org, a lot of those same people have studied the Bible in great detail - including the inconvenient parts of the bible they don't talk about much at the meetings.

    All you seem to be saying is, ' the bible said it- that settles it'. That's not good enough if you want to be taken seriously.

    FreeTheMasons
    @joeyjojo -
    If I cared more about what people think than about what Jehovah thinks, I'd still be in the JWborg now.
    You seem to care more about impressing people than truth, which is why you value "being taken seriously" more than I do.
    Are you a former JW elder?

    @JoeyJoJo said: No. In my 30 - ish years as a born in jw I never 'reached out'. Never an elder or m.s. - I didnt even auxilliary pioneer once.

    Then why are you trying to imitate their tactics?

    @JoeyJoJo said: Im not a fan of Garth Brooks or country music, so I dont know the song you are referring to, but thanks for dedicating it to me.

    (First Verse)

    Blame is all on my roots

    I showed up in boots

    And ruined your black tie affair, yeah

    The last one to know

    The last one to show

    I was the last one you thought you'd see there


    And I saw the surprise

    And the fear in his eyes

    When I took his glass of champagne

    And I toasted you

    Said, "Honey, we may be through

    But you'll never hear me complain"


    (Chorus)

    'Cause I've got friends in low places

    Where the whiskey drowns

    And the beer chases my blues away

    And I'll be okay

    I'm not big on social graces

    Think I'll slip on down to the oasis

    Oh, I've got friends

    In low places


    (Second Verse)

    Well I guess I was wrong

    I just don't belong

    But then, I've been there before

    Everything's alright

    I'll just say goodnight

    And I'll show myself to the door


    Hey I didn't mean

    To cause a big scene

    Just give me an hour and then

    Well, I'll be as high as that ivory tower

    That you're livin' in


    [Chorus]


    (Third Verse - not part of the original song but morphed into it over time...)

    Hey, I didn't mean

    To cause a big scene

    Just wait 'til I finish this glass

    And sweet little lady

    I'll head to the bar

    And you can kiss my ass!


    [Chorus]


    (Outro)

    Yeah!

    Oh, I've got friends in low places

    Where the whiskey drowns and the beer chases

    My blues away

    And I'll be okay

    I'm not big on social graces

    Think I'll slip on down to the oasis

    Oh, I've got friends in low places

    'Cause, Honey, I've got friends

    In low places

    @JoeyJoJo said: Enjoy your beer- I wish i was drinking one right now.

    Thank you. I did enjoy it.🙂 Maybe sometime we'll all have one together - while hanging out with Jesus too.😉

    https://www.facebook.com/wesshippmusic/videos/beer-with-jesus-thomas-rhett-cover/3558894677683833/?_rdr

    FreeTheMasons: For the same reason Herod saw him in a negative light - they didn't want to lose their power and control over people.

    @TonusOH said: Even though they knew he was divine?

    I asked the question to point out a flaw in the argument that the apostles would not have died for a fraud. We can point out this flaw in other ways, such as the claim that the Jewish priests --who were waiting on the Messiah-- would reject a man who performed miracles and spoke in a way that left people amazed. If people can act in an irrational manner, why not the apostles who supposedly preferred martyrdom? If their actions only make sense in the context of an actual god in their midst, how does that explain his rejection by the priests? Because they wanted something that they knew they would lose anyway? That doesn't make sense.


    That's why the Bible calls it "stupid" or "foolish" in the Proverbs.

    It's also why it's referred to as "mentally diseased" or "corrupted thinking" in the New Testament.

    To reject God's Son is stupid. It is foolish. The thinking of God's chief enemy is mentally diseased and corrupted. Just as a rusty car or a corroded wire stop functioning properly at a certain point, it's the same with Satan's brain. His thinking is so messed up from being disconnected from God. Satan knows God exists, but in his twisted mind he actually thinks he'll succeed in living even after disconnecting from Him. It's ridiculous.

    The wicked priests in the first century knew God existed. They knew it. And they knew who Jesus was. But their thinking ability was so out of whack that they really thought they'd succeed and get away with it.

    Jesus gave that illustration about the man with a vineyard who sent his heir to collect the harvest and the workers killed the heir. When we hear that illustration, we're like "what were they thinking?" And that is the point. Their thinking is so messed up - it's not logical at all.

    The same thing happens to people today who are following in the ways of the Pharisees.

    @TonusOH said: This sort of selective interpretation might be excused if it happens once, or if it can be explained away in a coherent manner. But this is typical of the Bible-- it is interpreted many different ways and inconsistencies and problems like the one described above are ignored or handwaved. After a while, it's not hard to understand what is happening-- we interpret it to suit our beliefs. This, in itself, is a flaw.

    It is a flaw. It is a flaw in their thinking. You see it again and again and again in those who are following in the footsteps of the Pharisees.

    They reject truth. They refuse to change. They deny God's Son. They are retarded. Seriously - they are mentally retarded - and I don't mean that in an insulting way - "retarded" as in slow.

    If they choose to wake up and turn around, that would be nice.

    It's too late for the Devil and the demons to turn around, but it's not too late for some of these pharisaical-types. When the Bible says there is no sacrifice left for those who blaspheme, what it means is that there's not going to be another ransom sent. The only ransom is the one Jesus paid with his blood already. So those retards have to look to that ransom. They must bend the knee to God's Son, Jesus, if they want to live forever.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit