The unending and fruitless argument on Trinity

by Longlivetherenegades 51 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Rattigan350
    Rattigan350

    "The diagram is scriptural and illustrates how Jesus is both Fully Man and Fully God. Please explain how my chart is unscriptural or inconsistent?"

    What scriptures support that diagram?

    The ones you listed there don't support that. Yes, God is spirit. Nothing to do with Body, Soul and Spirit. Yes, 1 Thess 5:23 says "may the spirit and soul and body of you brothers" it does not indicate a tripartite nature of man because while Pauls wrote that, he was wrong. Soul = body + spirit or breath. I accept what Genesis 2:7 said over Paul "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." Body + breath of life = living soul. 1+1 = 2. Not 1+1+ 1.

    "Jesus raised himself from the dead"

    If Jesus could do that, he wasn't dead. Then the sacrifice was invalid.

    No, death does not mean separation. Death means not working or functioning. It's like turning your computer off and unplugging it. It's dead. It won't come on.

  • Rattigan350
    Rattigan350

    Sanchy said "It's interesting how both sides of the argument could use different Bible scriptures to prove their point."

    No. There is nothing that the trinitarians can do to prove it. What they use are weak and irrelevant arguments from scriptures that are spurious and controversial. They just have their pet scriptures, but when examined they don't work.

    They like to use John 1:1. Word was God.

    But they don't understand that it was a prologue to the biography of Jesus written 65 years after his death.

    Doesn't that contradict Mark 1:1 "The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God;" But they don't see that.

    How about something contemporaneous to his life?

    They like to use what Thomas said "My Lord and My God" which is out of context, but they ignore specific sayings to the contrary.

    John 1:49 "Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel."

    And Matt 16:16 "And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God."

    Oh, but they created this "God the Son" thing to get around that.

  • MeanMrMustard
    MeanMrMustard
    No. There is nothing that the trinitarians can do to prove it. What they use are weak and irrelevant arguments from scriptures that are spurious and controversial. They just have their pet scriptures, but when examined they don't work.

    And they will say the same about you.

    Both sides have different fundamental ideas about what it means to be "a son" of anything. To you, it implies separateness. To them, continuity of nature.

    What does it mean to be a man? To you it means something physical - which is the opposite of God, which is spirit. To them, the physical is only one part, and that doesn't contradict the being spirit at the same time.

    For them, to be "man" implies a set of characteristics that make you a member of the category "man". Likewise there is a set of attributes and abilities that can only put you into the category of "God". To you, "God" isn't even a category, but a singular thing.

    For you, "spirit" is not unlike "the nature" of certain creatures, even God. To them, "the nature" of something is much more than "spirit" and, again, implies "category".

    I could go on and on... just look at the word "death" a few posts back.

    These threads end up in these cycles because you are speaking right past each other. Both sides operate with radically different definitions of just about every word that matters on this topic. That is why both sides can quote the same scripture, the exact same one, and yet both sides will act like it soundly ended the debate.

    Meanwhile, the patient continues to bleed.....

  • Anony Mous
    Anony Mous

    @rattigan: Jesus said he was going to hell, how could he go somewhere if he was completely dead, if he didn’t have a soul to descend. How can the Bible speak of things that aren’t literal. Did Jesus raise Lazarus by himself, or did he require the Spirit and God to do so, and if Jesus can direct the Holy Spirit (as alluded to throughout the NT), what makes him different than being God.

    Explain: Jesus declares himself the Lord of the Sabbath - Matthew 12:1–8, Mark 2:23–28 and Luke 6:1–5. How can he be the one that instituted the Sabbath (the one that set the law) when the OT claims that to be God. Or the other places where Jesus is supreme to or replacing the OT Law. He was convicted by the court for claiming to be God.

    The term Son of God has specific meaning both in Judaism and Christianity, you should look a bit deeper than the superficial objection from WOL, it carries no weight since approx. 2nd century AD.

  • Longlivetherenegades
    Longlivetherenegades

    @MeanMrMustard

    I have really enjoyed your comment on this topic. I think people love chasing shadows than reality as captured below......

    These threads end up in these cycles because you are speaking right past each other. Both sides operate with radically different definitions of just about every word that matters on this topic. That is why both sides can quote the same scripture, the exact same one, and yet both sides will act like it soundly ended the debate.

    The main reason why many religious organization today are conflicted internally leading to calling defectors apostates and conflicted externally by calling other religious denomination not part of their own false christians

  • aqwsed12345
    aqwsed12345
    @Rattigan350

    You argue that Jesus did not predict raising Himself from the dead because Acts states that God raised Him. However, John 2:19 explicitly records Jesus saying:

    "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."

    The context clarifies that Jesus was referring to His body (John 2:21). While Acts 2:24 and other passages state that God raised Jesus from the dead, this does not conflict with John 2:19. The New Testament repeatedly shows the cooperative work of the Trinity in the resurrection:

    • The Father raised Jesus (Acts 2:24; Romans 6:4).
    • The Son raised Himself (John 2:19; John 10:17-18).
    • The Holy Spirit raised Jesus (Romans 8:11).

    This reflects the unity and shared power within the Godhead. Jesus’ fully divine nature ensured He retained authority over life and death, even in His humanity.

    "If Jesus could do that, He wasn't dead. Then the sacrifice was invalid."

    This misunderstands the nature of death in biblical theology. Death does not mean annihilation or the cessation of existence; it is the separation of the body and spirit (James 2:26). Jesus truly died, as His human body ceased functioning and His spirit was commended to the Father (Luke 23:46). His fully divine nature, however, remained unchanging, allowing Him to fulfill His promise of resurrection.

    You suggest that the apostles may have misunderstood or misrecorded Jesus’ words. This claim undermines the trustworthiness of scripture. However:

    • Jesus promised that the Holy Spirit would guide the apostles into all truth (John 16:13).
    • The New Testament writings are consistent in their portrayal of Jesus’ deity, resurrection, and mission.

    Dismissing Jesus’ words because they seem “crazy” or because they were written years later ignores the historical reliability of scripture and the divine inspiration claimed by its authors (2 Timothy 3:16).

    "Death Means Not Working or Functioning"

    This analogy of death to a "powered-off computer" is not biblically accurate. The Bible defines death as separation:

    • Physical death: the separation of the soul/spirit from the body (Ecclesiastes 12:7; James 2:26).
    • Spiritual death: the separation of a person from God due to sin (Ephesians 2:1).

    Jesus’ death was real, as His human body ceased to function. His fully divine nature did not cease to exist, as God is eternal and unchangeable (Malachi 3:6). This is why He could simultaneously die as a man and conquer death as God.

    You claim that Trinitarians rely on "weak and irrelevant" scriptures, such as John 1:1 and Thomas’ exclamation in John 20:28, while ignoring passages like John 1:49 and Matthew 16:16. This is inaccurate:

    John 1:1 clearly identifies the Logos (the Word) as God. The prologue to John’s gospel establishes Jesus’ deity from the very beginning, showing that He existed eternally with God and as God. This is not "spurious" but foundational to the Christian understanding of Christ.

    In John 20:28, Thomas explicitly calls Jesus "My Lord and my God" (Greek: ho Theos mou). This is a direct affirmation of Jesus’ deity. It is not "out of context," as Jesus immediately affirms Thomas’ faith, saying, "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed" (John 20:29).

    Yes, Nathanael (John 1:49) and Peter (Matthew 16:16) confess Jesus as the "Son of God." This title does not contradict Jesus’ deity. In the Jewish context, "Son of God" implied equality with God (John 5:18), which is why the Jewish leaders accused Jesus of blasphemy (John 10:33).

    "They created this 'God the Son' thing to get around that."

    The title "God the Son" is a theological term summarizing biblical teachings about Jesus’ fully divine nature. It is consistent with the titles and attributes ascribed to Him throughout scripture.

    The claim that no first-century Christian believed in the Trinity ignores the gradual revelation of God’s nature in the New Testament. While the term "Trinity" is not in the Bible, the concept is:

    • One God: Deuteronomy 6:4; Isaiah 45:5.
    • The Father is God: Philippians 1:2.
    • The Son is God: John 1:1, John 8:58, Colossians 2:9, Hebrews 1:8.
    • The Holy Spirit is God: Acts 5:3-4; 2 Corinthians 3:17.

    The Trinity is not a later invention but the church’s articulation of what the Bible reveals about God.

    So your arguments rely on a misunderstanding of biblical texts and theological concepts. Jesus’ resurrection, His divine authority, and the consistent witness of scripture all affirm His identity as God the Son, fully divine and fully human. The doctrine of the Trinity is not "apostate" but a faithful reflection of the God revealed in the Bible.

  • Rivergang
    Rivergang

    An argument which has been going on now for over 1500 years is unlikely to be settled anytime soon!

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat
    What do you mean Rivergang? aqwsed is on the verge of acknowledging that the Trinity is wrong and Jesus was created. He’ll come round any day now can’t you see that?
  • Rivergang
    Rivergang

    Even if he does (which I doubt), it won’t be the end of the matter. A bit like a game of “Whack a Mole”, there will be scores there to take his place.

  • Sea Breeze
    Sea Breeze

    It is amusing to watch heretics imagine they are orthodox.

    There is simply no debate on this. Just google "early church fathers of the deity of Jesus" and read what the first and second generation leaders taught.

    That should end the disdusion. But, for people who wont believe the bible, certainly anyone else will be equally ignored.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit