Saint Satan, the testimony before congress that you posted, uses ellipses and gaps, a la the Watchtower, to hide the gist of what Clark said. You can find and read the entire testimony, and you'll find that Clark was indeed against the war, even though as an intelligent and honest person, testifying before congress, he was willing to look at the issue from both a "pro", and a "con" perspective. IOW, that string of quotes misleads in much the same way many watchtower articles mislead, even thought they may quote "accurately". I suggest that if you have an honest interest, you dig a little deeper than what Matt Drudge will spoon feed you.
As for his work for Acxiom, I see nothing untoward in it. I think the company probably has a good product that can be used to make us safer. CAPPS II has detractors sure, but it is meant to fix CAPPS 1, as I understand it. The fact that it has detractors does not mean that they have good arguments. Also, Acxiom had/has a product/service to be used by the program, it was not the program itself. I agree with Clark wholeheartedly when he says:
"We've been worried about general aviation security for some time. The aircraft need to be secured, the airfields need to be secured, and obviously we're going to also have to go through and do a better job of screening who could fly aircraft, who the private pilots are, who owns these aircraft. So it's going to be another major effort."Two years after 9/11 and we still haven't done jack shit on homeland security. Foot dragging passenger aviation is what allowed 9/11 to happen in the first place.