The Bible is my basis.
Well actually, no it's not. Your basis is the Governing Body's interpretation of the bible. There's a huge difference.
The apostles had varring ideas on matters at times and argued about them. They had to wait untill they were set straight.
And who exactly was it that "set them straight"? No one did. They simply argued amongst themselves until Paul generally won the argument, not because he was in the right, but because he knew how to enforce his beliefs upon others. The Governing Body members are no different. They've never got ONE prophecy right in 130 years, yet they still enforce their interpretation of the bible upon millions of others. God doesn't "set them straight", they just keep changing their interpretations and passing it off as "new light" from Jehovah.
In the days of Jesus people did not form their own conclusions as to what to beleive they were "persuaded" to believe.
Yes but they would have been able to talk to eye witnesses of Jesus' death and resurrection which gives a doctrine alot more credibility than hearing it 5th hand. Plus I don't recall the 1st century congregation prophecying that Jesus would start ruling "invisibly" from heaven in 1914, do you?
And where's this "proof" that Witnesses are allowed to have different opinions about doctrine that you were going to produce? We're all waiting to see it.