My dear Country_Woman,
"CZAR: and you fools call him a relic" and as he was calling "fools" others I was pointing out that his remarcs were not that intelligent (because they ain't). Read the posts before you write a reply.
I would call that fair enough...............
As far as the rest of your post, well ... ummm... yeah you're right if you see him as a "head of state" then I'm with you but if you see him as a "the rapresentative of Jesun on earth" then sorry I find that out of order.
as head of the Roman Catholic Church he is entitled to respect
No he isn't entitled to anything, he is entitled to what's granted to him. (like anybody else) With all due respect to you there's no connection between respect for him and the number of followers. (we call that a common place) There is however a connection between his believes and his actions. I don't have to agree with him in order to respect him, but I can judge his coherence (like with anybody else). So I will not grant him my respect because he is incoherent.
The man that didn't get to his bed was illustrative not meant to say that it was the pope's fault.
I apreciate you trying to be nice to all but I can see a lot of people saying what they want about JWs and many may even reconsider the catholics as an option even though pope is a much bigger prick then all the GB members put together.
Now you may remain onto your position and I can still respect you. But If I see you openly confessing your disrespect for GB then you will have proven to be incoherent. If I find many incoherences then you'll lose my respect. (we call that common sense).
That's why somebody goes out and creates a forum like this (He has found many incoherences with JWs and he's pissed off about it)
RESPECT