Well I suppose this is going to be really popular, however the statement has been made on this thread, "Someone at the conference said afterwards, how could the treaty be "fatally flawed" when almost every country in the entire world has now ratified it."
Be that as it may, the sentiment that the Protocol couldn't possibly be wrong because the entire world has now ratified it (Did it? I haven't heard the news today) is the same argument as "how could six million Jehovah's Witnesses be wrong?" The fact that large numbers of people decide to agree upon a matter does not make it right. That's the fatal flaw of pure democracy: the majority can be, and often is, wrong, sometimes fatally so - as in Germany in 1936. The protocol is little more than the expression of envy for the United States on the part of less successful countries and an attempt to bring us down to their level.
The idea that the U.S. should jump in because it produces X percent of the greenhouse gases IMO is absurd. That argument always stops short. The U.S. also produces HOW MUCH of the world's steel, copper, titanium, chromium, and other strategic materials necessary for its defense and that of its allies? It produces how much of the world's pharmaceuticals? Produces how many of the world's vital discoveries and advances in medicine and in all the sciences including physics, chemistry, biology, oceanography, and ecology and so on and on? It is the free world's marketplace and economic leader. And how frequently is it demanded, DEMANDED, of America by the rest of the free world to act as the world's policemen? And this is just the short list of American contributions to the world's well-being, comfort, and security...for which millions of Americans have given their lives.
The Brits have not the moral standing to criticize America. Once magnificent world leaders, the British have been reduced by their own decision-making to a second-rate, economically stagnant, socialist sink-hole, and now seek to have the U.S. join them in their misery. England is a primary example of what Barbara Tuchman, writing in "The March of Folly" styled as the "stupidity of a nation which takes actions in direct contravention of its own best interests."
The British also produced one of the greatest statesmen, leaders the world has ever known, who said, "I do not wonder that British youth is in revolt against the morbid doctrine that nothing matters but the equal sharing of miseries; that what used to be called the submerged tenth can only be rescued by bringing the other nine-tenths down to their level; against the folly that it is better that everyone should have half rations rather than that any, by their exertions, or ability, should earn a second helping. Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It is government of the duds, by the duds, and for the duds."
And Churchill - my personal hero - issued many other warnings of the dangers of a Fabian socialism, not the least of which is: "No socialist system can be established without a political police." And I say to hell with a political police, no matter how disguised; even when disguised as a seemingly desireable environmental effort. Unfortunately, Churchill was always to play Cassandra to the British people's Priam.
I say the Kyoto Protocol is little more than a premature reaction to an unproven theory; a statement that the world's environment can "only be rescued" by bringing nine-tenths of the world's economic power "down to their level," and I say to hell with it.
My $0.02.
Francois
P.S. You think Bush is bad? Have you taken a close look at that grinning idiot Prime Minister of yours lately?