That's a logical fallacy. Something is not true simply because it cannot be disproved.
I know that. I was just talking in general. I never said it was true.
The problem is defining natural unintellegent processess. The universe is interactive. The difference between creation and evolution is cause. In general creation God caused it in evolution nature caused it. What if god is a dumb process or what if nature is intellegent?
People ponder if there is such a thing as a god, but few question is there such a thing as nature. There could be no God, but evolution could be false. Life on earth could have been created.
Maybe I am missing the point of the evolution theory. What does it do again? I mean I know what evolution is, but maybe my unorthodox veiw is I can't see the point because the theory of evolution has no tangible impact on science out side of the bone filing sciences and epidemiology(maybe). Because we live in the present what ever is alive now is what matters. Unless you are dealing with a fast replicator then the theory of evolution sits on a self until you need to file something and that is only from tradition. You can't predict anything with evolution alone. I may be totaly inept right now so dont castrate me i am confused. Help me understand.