OK, let's say god does exist. But instead of some sort of personal god as is usually depicted, and who would act from this "personal" perspective, god is something beyond the personal image humans have created in their minds. In other words, if what is "god" is an impersonal "non-entity" - would there then be "anyone" to wreak "vengeance" upon humanity? Would there by "anyone" to "condemn" some while "saving" others? Why is there this persistence in clinging to ideas of a personal god, which would inherently contain limitation? Surely "god" would be beyond any and all limitation, would he not?
All ideas of "god" are just that, ideas. If there is such a thing as "god", what that word points to would be beyond the mind and all of the fabrications that mind would create concerning the nature of "god". Such a god would be unlimited and unbound by time or space, and therefore, he would exist in everything, including every human. Being inside each manifestation of creation, he would be available here and now. All that would be "required" to realize "god" would be the cessation of conceptualizing about him and remain present with what is in the here and now. Then ideas of being saved or condemned become meaningless.