fjtoth, you're way out in left field on this one. First off, there are similarities between every religious organizaion in the world today, similar to the ones you state below.
Catholics have a College of Cardinals and JWs have their Governing Body.
Not even a close compaison. College of Cardinals are a representation of a world religion representing 1.1 billion people (1/6th of world population). The Governing Body hides themselves in a bldg in the middle of downtown New York controlling a pithy 6 million dillusional followers.
Catholics have a pope, and the JWs have a president who, at least in the recent past (Rutherford, Knorr), exercised authority considered to be infallible.
Again, no comparison. When all the major news networks cover, for a period of week, the death and election of a WTS president then I will agreee that there is a semblance of similarity.
Catholics have clergy and laity categories, and JWs have their Governing Body members; "anointed class;" Bethelites; zone, district and circuit overseers; elders; pioneers; and others who are in a separate category from ordinary congregation publishers.
No comparison, again. A simple priest only becomes a priest after he finishes up 4-6 years of theological study. He is not elevated to a higher position, as someone moving into an elder slot, simply because he has been around longer than someone else, or is a better speaker. Most, if not all of the clergy of the RCC, speak a foreign language (latin in most cases). Many are multi-lingual, such as the recently deceased Pope, John Paul II, and the new Pope, Benedict 16. Most of the Cardinals have doctorates in theology, such as Benedict 16. And so forth and so on... Again, no comparison.
Catholics have archbishops, and JWs have zone overseers.
No comparison. See above.
Catholics have bishops, and JWs have district and circuit overseers. This comparison may be a bit fuzzy, but there is some resemblance.
No comparison. See above
Catholics place their church above the Bible, and so do JWs.
Negative. I'd like to know where are getting you information.
Catholics practice shunning through excommunications, and JWs do the same through disfellowshippings.
Negative. First off excommunication is very rare and not publically announced. If someone were excommunicated, not many would know about it, let alone shun the individual. Disfellowshipping is not rare. An RCC is not excommunicated for smoking, or attending another church, or questioning what a priest, bishop, or even what the Pope has got to say. And, by the way, every church has a similar disciplinary avenue, but none use it as much as the WTS.
Catholics for many centuries taught that salvation was dependent upon being a member of their organization. JWs teach that about themselves.
Negative. Salvation is through faith and grace.
Catholics worship Mary, and JWs worship their "mother organization."
Negative. Mary is not worshipped. She is not God. She is honored as the mother of God.
Catholics have their "saints," and JWs have their "anointed."
No compaison. How do annointed become annointed. Flash of light, sound of thunder? It normally takes a person, through a great deal of scrutiny and question, years to finally be recognized as a saint. Mother Theresa is currently going through the process and will be lucky to reach saint status, if she does, in the next 20 years.
Catholics have their Vatican City, and JWs have their tax-exempt central headquarters buildings on vast properties in the state of New York.
Have not idea what you mean here. The Vatican is a country, the smallest in the world.
The Catholic Church has great wealth, and the JW branches worldwide pull in more than a billion US dollars each year.
Agree. Not sure what your point is here.
The pope is said to be "the Vicar of Christ," and JWs equate their leaders with Christ by claiming the WT Society is controlled by and speaks for Jehovah himself as his "channel."
Sort of agree with you here, although the Pope has never claimed to get direction through personal communication with angels, as the WTS claims the GB does.
Catholics claim the line of popes extends back to the apostles, and JWs claim their heritage can be traced back to the apostles through various groups such as the Lollards, the Waldenses and others.
RCC's can show a historical documented line a succession. Don't think JW's can. No comparison.
For many centuries, the Catholic Church created a climate of fear by use of the Inquisition, the Jesuits, heresy trials and other authoritarian methods, and today JWs stir up fear in their members through heresy or apostasy trials, disfellowshipping committees and secret black lists of persons under suspicion.
For many centuries, yes. Now, no. Men are imperfect. The RCC past is nothing shout and cheer about. Though through all the good and the bad the RCC has flourished. In contrast, The WTS/JW for past 100 years, and at present, is nothing to shout and cheer about. How many have died over the years because of the cultish doctrines of no blood transfusions, no vaccinations, and no transplants. The RCC has apologised for it's past indescretions. Will the WTS apologise for the death of so many (a good number of them children)? In the past 25 years there were 250 million new members. Converts come to the RCC and remain because of a faith and love for Jesus Christ. Unfortunately, the WTS and JW's can't match this, and never will. Their Door-to-door antics are a failure and always will be. As a cult I give them another 15 to 20 years before its members finally figure it out and the organization self destructs.