1.[QUOTE]Should the Society be entitled to 'ecclesiatic privilege' as are other religions?[QUOTE]
What purpose does such privelege serve for an organization which claims to be morally superior to all others? JDubs are routinely instructed to "report" any and all knowledge of "sin" to elders. Why should the hierarchy be any different when it comes to pedophilia and the secular authorities?
2.[QUOTE]Should such a loophole be allowed when it involves protecting children?[QUOTE]
ABSOLUTELY NOT. If there is convincing evidence of such a crime, the family involved should be vigorously encouraged to pursue legal remedies. The current policy of "lets handle this in-house" is NOT working.
3.[QUOTE]How should the Society respond locally with a convicted pedophile. Should they ever be allowed back in the congregation? If yes to what level?[QUOTE]
If a convicted pedophile is on public record and must register wilth local authorities, the congregation members should be discreetly made aware of their presence, as well as precautions for protecting their children.
I dont think convicted pedophiles should be allowed to be elders or any other appointed position where they are able to be influential in childrens lives. I say this because of the high recedevism(<~~~ possibility of repeat offenses-is that the right word?) rate among pedophiles.
4.[QUOTE]How should local elders handle reports of alleged molestation? One child makes an accusation, what should they do? At what point should they notify authorities? At what point do they notify the congregation?[QUOTE]
See above answer to #3
Boozy