Posts by bennyk

10

YHWH...used by the Catholics....

by Golden Girl in

i was talking to my grown ex jw daughter the other day and we were discussing the new cathedral downtown.

the old one is still there but small.

i was telling her that the hebrew letters for "jehovah's name" is inscribed on the top of the cathedral.

bennyk

Actually, the Catholic New Jerusalem translation of the Bible has the name "Yahweh" in it thousands of times (if memory serves).

27

144,000 going to heaven, based on what??

by truth_about_the_truth in

let's face it, most jw's believe that there is clear biblical evidence that shows that only 144k will go to heaven and rule as kings during the 1000 yr reign.

when examining this topic without the aid of anything but the bible itself, it paints quite a different picture.

you would need to make some blind assumptions to come to the wt conclusion regarding this topic.. jws take it for granted this scripture rev.

bennyk

The 1995 WT refutes their own WTS doctrine re: only 144 000 going to heaven.

wt95 08/01 page 11 paragraph 8:

8 When Israel rejected and killed His Son, Jesus Christ, God finally rejected her. So no longer was that Jewish nation a figurative wife to Him, nor was He the Father and Teacher of her wayward sons. (Matt. 23: 37,38) However, Israel was only a typical, or symbolic, wife. The apostle Paul quoted Isaiah 54: 1, which speaks of a "barren woman" who is different and distinct from "the woman with the husbandly owner," the nation of natural Israel. Paul reveals that anointed Christians are children of the "barren woman," whom he calls "Jerusalem above." This antitypical figurative woman consists of God's heavenly organization of spirit creatures. -- Galatians 4: 26,27. (end of quote).

The scripture thus indicates (using the WTS' own interpretation of the 'women') that the number of anointed Christians exceeds that of fleshly Israel. The cumulative number of natural Israelites between the Exodus and the coming of Christ Jesus was in the many tens of millions; therefore, many more than 144 000 are spirit-anointed Christians.

4

More on dates........

by jula71 in

"but now we are in the end of this gospel age, and the kingdom is being established or set up.

our lord, the appointed king, is now present, since october 1874, a.d., according to the testimony of the prophets, to those who have ears to hear; and the formal inauguration of his kingly office dates from april 1878 a.d." (studies in the scriptures, vol.

4, page 621)

bennyk

They would just ignore it as "old light". Most of them, anyway...

The above is based on the fact that most ignored 1975 as "old light" (even in 1980!).

17

JOB's children celebrating birthdays

by eye 23 in

can anyone give me their view on why the bible says that after job's children celebrated 'their day' he went out and made sacrafices to god in case they had sinned and cursed god in their hearts ?.

the first part is a great talking part especially regarding job being a rightous man but the latter tends to counter act it some how by impling that job thoughts were that birthdays were wrong, in gods eyes.

especially as he did this after every birthday, so i can't really debate that it was one off event that might have encured some wrong doing at one particular party........if you understand what i mean.. thanks for any iput.

bennyk

If the celebration of birthdays is wrong BECAUSE in the scriptural accounts ONE person died at each of two such celebrations, would it not be forbidden to give (wedding) presents???

(1 Kings 9:16NWT: "(Pharaoh the king of Egypt himself had come up and then captured Ge'zer and burned it with fire, and the Ca'naanites dwelling in the city he had killed. So he gave it as a parting gift to his daughter, the wife of Solomon.)")

"New Light"!!!

18

Do Jehovah Witnesses Believe in the Trinity?

by researcher1 in

hello, my name is brian jackson.

i am a seventh-day adventist and i am doing a bible project for my 11th grade religion class and i chose the topic of the trinity and decided to compare that of the seventh-day adventist teachings with that of your teachings.. what do you believe about the trinity?.

also, a little off the topic, but why don't you believe in having an american flag in your sanctuary?.

bennyk

Actually, the JW's are descended from the SECOND ADVENTIST movement, NOT from the Seventh-Day Adventists. The SDA has its origins in the Second Adventist movement also; one might say the JW's and SDA's are 'cousins'. (No offense, AshtonCA)

31

Comments You Will Not Hear at the 4-24-05 WT Study (Self-Sacrifice) 3-15-05

by blondie in

god or the wts?

is there anything we can give god or jesus to earn/buy everlasting life?

bennyk

Blondie,

Thanks for your hard work.

Perhaps I should obtain a copy and cut out paragraph nine. It will be prove a great comfort to read it after the three-man spiritual Gentile Judicial Committee does their work and pronounces me an 'Evil Slave'.

50

What stupid things did you confess to the elders?

by sweet tee in

i forced my husband to confess to the elders that we were having os!

damn that was stupid ... he was great at it .

i also made him tell the brothers that he changed a number on our temporary license tag (don't laugh!

bennyk

Not exactly stupid CONFESSIONS, just stupid that I opened my mouth at all:

1) told ONE elder in another cong (an old friend) that I was anointed. He suggested that a medical examination determine whether a brain tumor was present. [NO TUMORS were discovered.] My having spoken to him has complicated my "fade".

2) told ONE elder in a third cong (another old friend) that by the ORG's definition I was guilty of apostasy (for numerous and sundry heretical beliefs, some of which we discussed) and that the WTS has become the object of golden-calf idolatrous worship and that never again would I set foot in a KH. He promised he would not denounce me and said he hoped we could stay in touch.

5

1874 vs. 1914

by mnb77 in

in my study of the history of the jws, i have come across a piece that says the jw's story keeps changing.

the book i am reading says, " it is one thing to claim that christ returned invisibly in 1914, but another thing to make that caim after you have already sopent 50 years telling people that he returned invisibley in 1874-- and then changed your mind.

yet the jw org has done just that.

bennyk

And then the GB uses this falsehood as a credential to prove their divine appointment. 'The pre-1914 anointed had calculated that the Bridegroom, Christ Jesus was about to make an appearance...' (WT 2004 01.March, second study article, paragraph 6 (maybe).) This, as you have pointed out, is patently untrue.

12

Who are the anointed?

by gringojj in

exactly who are the anointed?

does the wts have a list of the 144?

i am curious to find out if they are all white people from brooklyn.

bennyk

Old Soul: Yes, Ted is judging the house servant of another. And no, no anointed individual can be certain if another person IS anointed, but plenty of people claim they can tell when someone ISN'T. However, the entire WTS doctrine is severely in error. A quick (or even a long, slow) glance at Galatians 4:26,27 shows the number of anointed Christians through the years to exceed that of fleshly Israel; i.e. tens of millions... "Drunk" Rutherford got that doctrine wrong among many others (and whence came the 1932/1933/1935? Clearly not from the scriptures!).

P.S. No doubt Ted thinks I'm a fake, too. That doesn't bother me because he is a fake and his opinion matters NOT to me.

36

Comments You Will Not Hear at the 4-17-05 WT Study

by blondie in

paragraph 5.

paragraph 6.

paragraph 7.

bennyk

My Mum reports that at her Sunday meeting the WT Study was paired with a talk on relationships. In the public talk the worthy brother announced that the three parts of the three-fold cord (Eccl. 4:12) were the husband, his wife, and [NOTE THIS] "Jehovah's Organization" (!) Admittedly not in print, directly from the WTS --still, it was the statement of a "spirit-appointed Elder". When, exactly, did these people become completely demonized?