I am not a defender of the congregations, nor the WTS, nor individual elders. That said, I must
strongly add that, while very legalistic, the things discussed here are normal precautions.
You have to cooperate with a warrant, but you should have legal counsel available. While the
reading of the warrant and contacting the WT lawyers sounds like delay tactics, I would suggest
that anyone faced by the law should take similar actions. It's not a big deal. There are plenty
of files that would not relate to the search, that would need protection. If the elder refused to
cooperate once clearly served a warrant, he can expect the authorities to tear up the file cabinets
or break down doors, but their search would take longer without cooperation. It is important to get
counsel to make sure they do not go beyond the search allowed by the warrant, and how much
cooperation to give. You should do the same if ever faced with a warrant.
Now, what would be disgusting is to hide or destroy records to protect the molester/criminal.
What would also be disgusting is (as I have read stories) to discourage victims from pursuing
criminal prosecution, or disfellowshipping them for not supporting the forgiveness of said criminals.
I think some people here are thinking about the disgusting actions of the congregation and combining
that feeling with their thoughts on this legal matter. Individual and organizational rights must be
maintained. Separate the horrible action from the legal rights.