Amazing, that was an amazingly good essay. Damn good. I see that we're cut from pretty much the same piece of leather (although your statement "The President does not rule by decree or even make legislation" has one little crack in it - the executive decree. Remember "stoke of the pen, law of the land. Cool!)?? I certainly remember it.
Also, I'm very opposed to direct election and the mob rule it contemplates.
As for political discussion having devolved into little more than emotionalism, you couldn't be more precise. And that couldn't be more sad. It seems our national political discourse is being conducted by the extreme wings of both parties: the near Marxists like Gephardt, Daschle, Bonior, Clinton, Kennedy, and Harkin on the one hand, and the far right like Armey and the army of others (actually, I listen more to the leftists than I do to the right wing. "know your enemy" as Sun Tzu advised). I frankly am tiring of the entire endless debate.
Anyway, thanks very much for a very well done essay.
Francois
P.S. JULIE - It's worse than that. Clinton was elected by 43% OF THOSE VOTING. And that was a very low number, seeing as something like only 53.5% of elegible voters actually cast ballots. Thus Clinton was elected by 43% of 54.5%, or about 23%. And if Ross Perot hadn't drained 19 million votes from Bush, we would never have been saddled with that amoral, unethical, crooked bastard Clinton.
Where it is a duty to worship the Sun you can be sure that a study of the laws of heat is a crime.