Patriot
JoinedTopics Started by Patriot
-
42
Are't You Sick of This??
by Explorer inaren't you sick of being filled with so much hate ?
i think hate is one of the greatest sins.
satan hates jehovah, and his people.
-
4
Society's Arrogant Claim - "Spirit Appoint...
by metatron inover the past couple decades, the quality of watchtower writing.
and depth of scriptural reasoning has declined.
whatever illogic.
-
44
Wrong date
by tattoogrl333 inhello i'm new to the whole jw study thing, but they said it fell in 607 but due to the advice of others here i looked it up.
i found in 3 encyclopedia's online that it fell in 586. i printed them out and am going to get more.
i'm going to show the lady i study with, i'm just curious what you think will happen, and if she will try to deny it.
-
18
Should mentally challenged be baptize as JW's
by spike inwe have a son of legal age,only mentally 5-8 years living with jw relatives.
he studies with the presiding overseer in the knowledge book and goes in service.
he wants to get baptized like his older brother.
-
13
District Convention 2001?
by Patriot ini bumped into an old m.s.
who has not yet realized that i haven't gone to a meeting in about 20 months and asked me if i had my district convention yet.
i said no that it was "coming up".. he then told that there was "new information" given and an "adjustment" in the way we do things.
-
23
JW Jokes...
by philo inhow many jws does it take to change a lightbulb?
one, but mature christians will wait for the new system .
how many elders...?.
-
5
Anointed?.... Only in your head
by Patriot inhi to all the old friends.
its been to long, about a year since my last post as " maverick".
anyway "hi" to the old timers like amazing, seeker, esmeralda, m2u, truthexodus, unclebruce,worf and many more too many to list.
-
22
Carbon-14 Dating
by Amazing inhello all: in discussing evolution, creation, and bible chronology we will at some point pass through various dating methods that challenge religious beliefs, especially that of the watch tower religion.. some years ago the watch tower society published material (i forget the actual reference) that challenged carbob-14 dating as flawed and prone to error, especially when dating fossils.
the wts cited some sources that dealt with sample contamination that may cause errors in reading half-life of carbon-14.. i wish i could find the article again, because it was published when i was still working in nuclear engineering.
i recall feeling that the wts was stretching the claims to cover the understanding of bible chronology regarding the age of homo sapiens being about 4,026 years.