peacefulpete

Joined

• started 372 topics
• posted 6,567 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by peacefulpete

• 
  15

  U turn in vac mandate

  by ElderBerry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so now they don’t want defib machines in khalls because it shines a light on the increasing blood clots from the shots that they said were safe.

  https://youtu.be/yvvyiuqv3nm.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  Surely the rise of AI and the availability of AEDs are not a coincidence! These so-called life-saving devices are in fact secret death instruments.
• 
  9

  Why did God stop intervening in human affairs and deliverance of his people?

  by RULES & REGULATIONS in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the bible is full of stories of god intervening on behalf of those that had trust and faith in him.

  he rescues his people from various battles, trials and challenges from their enemies.

  the rescued individuals or communities are quick to offer praise and gratitude to god for his mighty acts on their behalf.. the story of the israelites’ exodus from egypt and the parting of the red sea is a prime example of god’s powerful deliverance in the bible.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  Sometimes we forget that when the first readers of these stories read them, they asked the same question.
• 
  152

  Do JWs believe Jesus is an angel?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i would suggest:.

  the short answer is yes.. the longer answer is a qualified yes, with some caveats.

  the short answer is yes because jehovah’s witnesses teach that jesus is michael the archangel, their leader, eldest and most powerful, and have taught this since the very beginning of the religion.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  Days ago, slimboy screenshot an excerpt from a book discussing the evolution of the messiah concept. That book and many others have demonstrated, very convincingly, that among the diverse sects of Hellenized Judaism a matrix of pre-Christian concepts gelled into Christianity. The 'Two Powers' theology, "The Great Angel", Holy Spirit, Wisdom, Shekhinah, Light, Logos and Son of God, Son of Man, concepts all occur or were understood as embodied emanations of God during second temple Judaism. Substitutes for God as it were. When the first Christians 'perceived' from these texts and 'visions' an invisible drama of the Christ descending from the highest regions of heaven and being hung on a tree by wicked spirits, their seemingly foreign ideas were actually a natural extension of a sophisticated Jewish ideation of God and Messianism. Given the diversity of Judaism and Hellenism that inspired Christianity, it would seem unrealistic to insist upon a singular picture of 'original' Christianity. In this model of Christian origins, we begin with broad strokes of belief in divine salvation through an invisible emissary of God.

  As I've expressed before, it appears certain second/third generation Christians adapted Old testament narratives to dramatize the invisible. They freely drew from the OT, hundreds of story and prophetic elements to 'flesh out' what was understood as spirit. I suspect that the original form of Mark was a didactic play for recruitment or instruction. Christ was given a name, Emmanuel and Joshuah, his father was Joseph, the towns he lived in were Bethlehem and Nazareth, he walked the exact routes of OT figures, he sat at the same well, he performed the OT miracles, all drawn from the OT and related writings. The popularity of this dramatization unfortunately led to literalization. Christianity was transformed via euhemerism. What was once an esoteric faith in the divine formed through visionary interpretation was overlain with a cult of a literary person killed by Romans. The Church Fathers and others created a hybrid of the two. They were intellectually attracted to the higher Christology of the original but leaned on the literalizations as a defense. The same continues today.

  Is it any wonder debates about the nature of this Christ have continued for 2000 years? The modern selection of texts used for these debates were chosen by Church Fathers and later leaders to permit both a fully divine Christ and a fully human Joshua.
• 
  152

  Do JWs believe Jesus is an angel?

  by slimboyfat in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i would suggest:.

  the short answer is yes.. the longer answer is a qualified yes, with some caveats.

  the short answer is yes because jehovah’s witnesses teach that jesus is michael the archangel, their leader, eldest and most powerful, and have taught this since the very beginning of the religion.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  1 Sam 17:12 Now David [was] the son of that Ephrathite of Bethlehem judah, whose name [was] Jesse...
  

  Micah 5 was repeating a belief that someone of the small 'clan of Bethlehem Ephrathah' would rule Israel. When that was written that clan's origins were already from the mythic past, "whose origins are from of old, from ancient times."

  
  
• 
  24

  Voting, why make it easier to vote??

  by moomanchu in

  1. social
  2. current

  democrats are always harping on and on about voting rights and how the ability to vote should be easier and access unrestricted.

  the most progressive ones want to allow prisoners, and illegals with no voter id the ability to vote along with the criminals, drug addicts, and uneducated low lives who already can vote.. .

  after they push for everyone and anyone to be able to vote they then tell us it is a sacred privilege, a duty and honor, and a big responsibility blah, blah ect..... if it is all those grandiose things are true i think it should be harder to vote not easier.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  

  II admit, I'm a little afraid. This is just not normal.
  
• 
  24

  Voting, why make it easier to vote??

  by moomanchu in

  1. social
  2. current

  democrats are always harping on and on about voting rights and how the ability to vote should be easier and access unrestricted.

  the most progressive ones want to allow prisoners, and illegals with no voter id the ability to vote along with the criminals, drug addicts, and uneducated low lives who already can vote.. .

  after they push for everyone and anyone to be able to vote they then tell us it is a sacred privilege, a duty and honor, and a big responsibility blah, blah ect..... if it is all those grandiose things are true i think it should be harder to vote not easier.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  Yep. I understand that.

  Can people with felony convictions vote? (usafacts.org)

  It's an interesting question. Does a felon lose their right of franchise because they are no longer fully citizens? Some might argue keeping a convicted felon engaged with larger society could be helpful. A large factor in recidivism is the sense of alienation from the community many felons feel.
• 
  125

  Mandated Shunning is a Crime

  by Lee Marsh in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  mandated shunning is on the rise around the world with devastating effects on millions of people.

  shunning that is mandated by organized groups to its members is a form of both physical and psychological violence against those people being shunned and cut off from their family and life-long relationships.

  mandated shunning means that the shunning is ordered from the top down.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  'Disfellowshipped' was too self defining, it meant what it said and what it said was emotional abuse....'Removed' simply implies, taken off the church rolls. It's a strategic effort to get governments, concerned about abuse and familial alienation, off their back.
• 
  24

  Voting, why make it easier to vote??

  by moomanchu in

  1. social
  2. current

  democrats are always harping on and on about voting rights and how the ability to vote should be easier and access unrestricted.

  the most progressive ones want to allow prisoners, and illegals with no voter id the ability to vote along with the criminals, drug addicts, and uneducated low lives who already can vote.. .

  after they push for everyone and anyone to be able to vote they then tell us it is a sacred privilege, a duty and honor, and a big responsibility blah, blah ect..... if it is all those grandiose things are true i think it should be harder to vote not easier.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  liam...it's good to see some States are responsibly closing loopholes.
• 
  24

  Voting, why make it easier to vote??

  by moomanchu in

  1. social
  2. current

  democrats are always harping on and on about voting rights and how the ability to vote should be easier and access unrestricted.

  the most progressive ones want to allow prisoners, and illegals with no voter id the ability to vote along with the criminals, drug addicts, and uneducated low lives who already can vote.. .

  after they push for everyone and anyone to be able to vote they then tell us it is a sacred privilege, a duty and honor, and a big responsibility blah, blah ect..... if it is all those grandiose things are true i think it should be harder to vote not easier.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  liam.....Trump is a convicted felon yet he voted the other day. How was this possible?

  According to Forbes:

  As a Florida resident with an out-of-state conviction, Trump would only be prohibited from voting if the state where he was convicted restricts him from voting, according to the Florida Division of Elections.

  According to New York law, Trump would only be restricted from voting if he is behind bars, meaning Trump can still vote in Florida as long as he avoids prison time in New York.
• 
  24

  Voting, why make it easier to vote??

  by moomanchu in

  1. social
  2. current

  democrats are always harping on and on about voting rights and how the ability to vote should be easier and access unrestricted.

  the most progressive ones want to allow prisoners, and illegals with no voter id the ability to vote along with the criminals, drug addicts, and uneducated low lives who already can vote.. .

  after they push for everyone and anyone to be able to vote they then tell us it is a sacred privilege, a duty and honor, and a big responsibility blah, blah ect..... if it is all those grandiose things are true i think it should be harder to vote not easier.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  peacefulpete

  Gun buyers are required to submit to a background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS)...The NICS has conducted more than 300 million checks since launching in 1998, leading to over 3 million denials.

  I'm assuming you know that first line is not true. The vast majority of gun sales are private and untraced. I sold a 357 handgun out of my trunk in a McDonald's parking lot, lol. I've bought and sold hunting guns off Craigslist and classified ads. Background checks, that's hilarious. The 3 million gun buyers that failed the background check just bought what they wanted at the next gun show.

  But the op was about facilitating every citizen's right to vote, If all Americans embraced that right as dearly as some embrace their '2nd amendment right', we would not be having this discussion.