Thanks BG for the reply. I am not/nor could not post here regarding Snoozy/Dragon. Nor am I "attacking" Dragon, except to point out why certain posts were made.
Plum said:
I saw some of the debate over at TC's board. I saw a few debates and a lot of slamming and mudslinging/personal attacks but didn't see the part where kenpodraggon said he wasn't going to post on DBs anymore. Perhaps he meant "that" board. I can't really believe that the dragon has completely stopped posting because of what a few people on another forum want to accuse him of. He is much to caring of a person and certainly doesn't seem like the type to throw his toys down and refuse to play anymore. If some kids don't want to play fair then there are plenty of others around that do.
The only reason I am in this thread is because of this comment. If she had meant 1 person, then she should have said so, but she didn't - she said "a few". Therefore I am questioning her as to what and who she meant. Up until then, I was content to keep my mouth shut.
I don't want my comments to be taken "anti-Dragon", nor "pro-Snoozy" as I don't know enough of the situation to make a judgement call - and I don't want to. We all must take ones as we find them, the good, the bad & the ugly. Sometimes people are seemingly cruel, and for no good reason. But that can be said of everyone (perhaps sadly even myself).
But, the core of these threads were not about Snoozy & Dragon, regardless of what they degenerated into. They were about Silent Lambs, an organization he ridiculed with a vengence. Therefore, Plum's comments made no sense. And I am simply asking her for clarification - which private e-mail would handle just fine (duh!!! why didn't I think of that before).
Thanks for your reply. I do understand your point. This is truly an akward position to be in.