AnnaNana,
Someone with "boots on the ground" may not agree with you.
Despite what you are there insinuating, I, too, speak from first-hand experience (or "boots on the ground", as you put it).
During the 47 years I was involved with electrical power generation, I saw firsthand how automation transformed that industry by an astonishing degree. When I first entered it back in 1978, power station control rooms had to be manned continuously. This required three 8-hour shifts, each with at least three operating personnel, just to get through a single 24-hour period. In fact, becoming a power station operator was an attractive career choice for electricians, fitters or instrument technicians who wanted to progress "off the tools".
However, well before the year 2000, these same power stations had become totally deserted for 16 hours of the day; and with only maintenance staff being present during the remainder of the time. Almost all the production operator jobs had been eliminated by "Tech" (in the form of PLCs, Distributed Control Systems and SCADA).
Tech is limited and becoming overly reliant on it is unwise. The human component of life and work is integral to success of the earth
Not so, it gets rid of the most unreliable part of the entire process - the error prone human operator.
This "blossom" of tech will not last. It is not sustainable
Back in the day, there was plenty of that sort of talk going on, too! None of it, though, proved to be correct.