UD,
It's a great thread you started over there...
I don't agree 100% with all the statements made in that thread about the 6/1 article because the WT will always be able to point to "UN political connections" for any expected political moves made against global religion and then the JWs. They expect the UN/beast/horns to be behind the attack on JWs, but have never been adamant about UN being directly involved in the JW attack, which they expect from the King of the North. In general the K.N. vs. K.S. conflict has always boiled down to Totalitarian vs. Democratic world powers (or coalitions). It's a safe bet that they can still get some mileage out of that.
The 6/1 article does fit a fairly recent pattern, however, of "Watchtower weaseling" for their own political, legal and public relations agenda. I wouldn't be surprised to hear a few more public talks that express the UN issue in the same old 1950s-1980s terms -- same as it ever was. I would expect to see almost nothing any more in print, however. It doesn't mean that they'll stop believing. It will just fade out, but there will be a vague collective memory that there were things the WTS used to speak of that shows they still have special knowledge. Scientology, for example, has a lot of esoteric teachings that you'd be hard-pressed to find in hard copy, but some die-hard believers will always think that the understanding of those teachings is only accessible to a few "higher-ups"-- and this validates the intellectual side of that Church's power structure or hierarchy.
The more things change...
Gamaliel