Don't blame the Governing body because elders just follow along. They need to stand up for what they believe and be their own people.
That's all well and good, and in some cases I do agree (especially up until the recent past) that that might have been the case, but in recent years - certainly since around the 2000s when the current GB began to come together - there are a number of things that mitigate against that.
1) In some - perhaps many - congregations, some elders hold more sway than others. For example, where you have families where two or more men (perhaps father and son) are on the body of elders. In these cases, even if you are an elder trying to appeal to mercy and leniency in a judicial matter, you could be overruled and possibly even brow-beaten into changing your view to accept the harsher outcome because more influential or dominant elders force their opinion on the rest.
2) In areas where the organisation has completely changed the direction - such as the subject of submitting ministry hours, or in some doctrinal matters, you could have been a faithful elder agreeing with, and obeying, exactly what you are told for years, but now you are expected to do a complete 180° turn, yet still hold to the idea that when you were doing the exact opposite you were also doing the right thing. In such cases, that's not the choice of the elder at all - it's the GB that has moved the goalposts by "reinterpreting" the Scriptures and how they should be applied.
Also, bear in mind that in areas where elders had more discretion in the past, that has often been taken away and replaced with more explicit direction. Think for example of all the branch letters these days which give minute detail about how to carry out actions and convey information, along with frequent revisions to the elders' Shepherd book on what should or should not be done in various matters.
Think also of the congregation meetings themselves: years ago, the organisation provided an outline programme in the Kingdom Ministry of how each midweek meeting should be conducted, but local elders could (and did) deliver and emphasise points according to their own discretion for their own congregation. Now meetings are increasingly proscriptive, often with videos which are expected to be played directly, and only limited, pre-formatted questions which must be asked, with no additional time for variation or deviation from the "script". Likewise, the CBS, which has been brought into the main midweek meeting and so now has little variance, and also often has significant video segments (depending on the publication). Even the CO visits can have video clips directed from "on high" from GB HQ itself.
The room for elders to apply their own "Bible-based conscience", knowledge of the local Witnesses, or personal discretion has been severely reduced in many areas, now that everything is provided directly from "mother" online and in videos and broadcasts.