IT HAS BEGUN "BIG" NEWS ON AP NEWS WIRE

by DannyHaszard 402 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Terry
    Terry
    Judaism and Christianity have always understood these scriptures to ban blood-eating for nourishment. This underlies Judaism's kosher procedures to extract blood from meat, which Witnesses do not follow. Christianity eventually decided the rule was temporary.

    Nah...

    The Noahide Laws (Laws of the sons of Noah given by God to gentiles after the flood and as binding as the decalogue was to Jews) mention this selfsame

    prohibition and it has nothing to do with eating blood for nourishment. It has to do with SHEDDING blood in revenge (atonement murder which is still practiced in half the world by next of kin.)

    Not eating things strangled is the clause that covers eating blood for nourishment.

    T.

  • minimus
    minimus

    I couldn't think of the TV program where Bill from Silentlambs was on. "The Silent Lambs TV show" does sound funny. Of course I'm a firm believer in getting the message out against the Witnesses. But I stand by my comments regarding this "News" as to how it will affect the average JW sitting at the KH during a Service Meeting. It won't affect them because it's no "BIG NEWS" to them. The rest of the world rightly believes the JWs are wrong on the blood stand. That's nothing new. For year, off and on, TV shows from Bill Casey and Dr. Kildaire (I'm dating myself) would expose the JWs nutty deathly view on blood. Remember how a JW thinks!!! It's persecution or a test.

  • seven006
    seven006

    Min,

    Don’t confuse questions and refuted opinions as just that all the time. Some are just made to be making them. Some are made to bring attention to oneself. I have seen in threads where E offers to help people and is a real person and that is very admirable. When it comes to legal matters he comes off as the ultimate authority. He seems to refute for the sake of refuting. I question his agenda. Is it to really bring out things some of us my have not thought of or is it to flash his law degree? What does he hope to accomplish and who is it really helping? Is there any real benefit made with his comments or does it just bring attention to himself and self validation that he is a smart guy?

    As far as me being a bit smug at times, I can see where people may think that. Once they get to know me they understand why and what it really is.

    As far as you loving me, for get it. I have told you a thousand times I am not gay and I will not sleep with you so stop telling me about your feelings for me!

    Love ya back buddy.


    Dave

  • Frannie Banannie
    Frannie Banannie
    TV shows from Bill Casey and Dr. Kildaire

    um.......that's BEN Casey, Min.

    Frannie (of the thought he was a stud muffin back then class)

  • minimus
    minimus

    ......Thanks toots!

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex

    I've never seen in Dave what you see Min. I've always liked his honest approach; I like being people who say what they think. He calls BS when he sees it and can back it up. I respect that. He's one of a handful of people I'd listen to.

    But he would look terrible in a kilt.

  • DevonMcBride
    DevonMcBride



    Persistence breaks Resistence


    If the media doesn't respond to your e-mails, re-submit them under a different name/e-mail or have your friends and family do it. The more requests they get to run a story like this the more likely they are to do it. I've submitted this article and other releases on this subject to CNN more than once, hoping they'll put the lying author, James Frey, to rest and do an important story like this one.

  • Finally-Free
    Finally-Free
    He seems to refute for the sake of refuting.

    Isn't that what lawyers do? I always thought that was their ultimate purpose in life.

    W

  • minimus
    minimus

    Big Tex, you just don't know.....Dave's got such a husky voice.

  • Big Tex
    Big Tex

    Well so do you.

    Besides I've got a soft spot for damnyankees. I married one.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit