psycsnacha said:
: Thus far I have choosen not to answer direct questions because it would lead off into many tangents.
But the devil is in the details, no?
On the other hand, you've posed quite a number of direct questions which have been well answered. Why the double standard?
: I mainly wanted to feel out the group.
If you're interested only in the emotional aspects, then don't post specific, direct questions about anything else. Otherwise you won't sound sincere.
: Plus, with the JWs matching cult theory. Wouldn't you say that the Mosaic law's governance over the Jews made them by the logic proposed here, a cult as well?
Absolutely! Today's fanatical Hasidic Jews are about as close as we today can get to the fanaticism of ancient Jewry. They're a cult by most definitions, and so are any fanatical Christians. But the majority of Christians are not in cults, since they don't display the fanaticism and aversion to reality that is the hallmark of cultism.
: Regarding the "increasing light" rational being a WTS excuse, the bible supports this.
Nonsense.
Now, if you want real discussion and not just a touchy feely bunch of words that avoid unpleasant details, you're going to have to do better than you have.
: The bible shows that Jehovah HAS used IMPERFECT people to carry out his will in the past. He has used both those who were dedicated to him as well as those who were not (the Babylonians and the Romans in bringing down the nation of Israel for example). This tells me that it is not necessarily the credibility of the people that I should look at to decide if Jehovah is working THROUGH them or not rather it is their works and how it fits with Bible prophecy. Right?
You've clearly been snookered by the JWs into their self-serving way of dealing with this question. It's not quite that simple. According to the Bible, God used Nebuchadnezzar to wreak havoc on the unfaithful Jews. Did that mean that people faithful to God had to pay allegiance to Nebuchadnezzar and obey his laws regarding religion or whatever to gain God's approval? Of course not. So the mere fact that God might use someone to accomplish some goal means nothing about whether that someone ought to be looked on as God's spokesman. And the latter is precisely what the JWs are all about. The Fundamental Doctrine of Jehovah's Witnesses goes something like this: Thou shalt view the Governing Body as speaking directly for Jehovah and thou shalt obey it as thou wouldst Jehovah himself.
You don't believe this? Would you like to see some direct quotations from Watchtower literature to prove it? Or are you unconcerned with such details?
: Regarding the 607 issue. That's interesting, I'll have to research that.
Do yourself a favor and do your research apart from Watchtower literature. If you do a good job, and then go back to Watchtower literature, you'll see where the Society has deliberately left out all sorts of relevant information and engaged in flat out lying. A good example can be found on this board, in the threads on this subject participated in by a JW defender who calls himself "scholar". Use the Member Directory link at the top of this web page to find the most recent of such posts. You'll see that this charlatan consistently refuses to deal with the facts, and distorts what he doesn't ignore.
: It though would not change the fact that the Bible considers the times we live in now, the 'last days' which is the more important issue.
How do you know that? Because the Bible predicts that "the last days" would commence in 1914?
If you give the devil his due and look at the details, you'll find that almost nothing the Watchtower has claimed about 1914 or "the last days" is true. Here's a brief summary:
C. T. Russell first predicted that Armageddon would come not later than 1914, and probably as early as 1904 or so.
When 1904 passed without incident, Russell moved up his timetable a bit to 1910.
When 1910 passed, Russell focused more intensely on 1914 and changed some of his claims, such as that perhaps the Big A might come in 1915.
When what much later became known as World War I broke out, and nothing else happened to fulfill Russell's many claims, he claimed a win. But when 1914 ended and the world was still pretty much intact, he claimed that Armageddon would come by 1918.
After Russell died in 1916, his followers, with J. F. Rutherford at the helm, again predicted that 1918 would bring Armageddon.
As 1918 passed, they predicted that 1920 would see great fulfillments of Bible prophecy.
From 1918 through 1922, Rutherford's followers gradually became engaged in the "Millions Now Living Will Never Die" campaign, which was based on the prediction that 1925 would bring Armageddon.
By 1930, more than 3/4 of the Bible Students had quit because of Rutherford's and Russell's failed predictions and other failures.
Rutherford predicted the imminent end of the world once again in 1941.
Under N. H. Knorr, the Witnesses expected the end in sometime in the early 1950s.
Beginning in 1966, the Watchtower Society began predicting that 1975 would see Armageddon.
When that fell through, many JWs quit, seeing correctly that they had been deceived by a cult.
Later, various JWs expected "the end" in 1984, 1994 and 2000. The Society specifically stated the latter date in the January 1, 1989 edition of The Watchtower.
So, with such a record of false predictions and false interpretations of "Bible prophecy", why would you have any confidence in the Watchtower's claims about other supposed fulfillments?
Let's take their claims about major events that supposedly characterize these "last days" commencing in 1914. Supposedly, war, famine, pestilence and earthquakes have been so much more severe than prior to 1914 that no one with normal powers of observation could fail to see it. But the facts say different. The 20th century has arguably been at most slightly above the 19th century in per capita deaths due to war. So there's not much change there. However, deaths due to famine and pestilence are reduced significantly in absolute numbers, and drastically in per capita numbers compared to the 19th century. The risk of dying in an earthquake is between two and four times lower today than in previous centuries.
You don't believe any of this? Consider the effects that drastic increases in major causes of death would have on world population. So many would be dying prematurely that population would necessarily decrease. But the population explosion of the 20th century completely blows away any claims that unusually massive die-offs due to war, famine, pestilence and earthquakes are occurring. In fact, the average life span today is far higher than a century ago.
Care to deal with the details?
: I'm not interesting in subverting the truth, but I emphasize that my concern is, has always been, and will always be larger than the integrity of an organization which is only a vehicle guiding me to Jehovah.
But it's not even such a vehicle. First, by falsely claiming to be God's exclusive spokesmen on earth today, JW leaders have disqualified themselves from validly making such a claim. It's easy to demonstrate that they've deliberately lied about any number of subjects. These are not mere mistakes that all humans are prone to -- they're much bigger than that.
For example, the Society claims that it is justified in constantly crying "Wolf!" as shown above with its many false predictions. It has published books with titles like, The Time Is At Hand, The Kingdom Is At Hand, God's Kingdom of a Thousand Years has Approached, and so forth. But as AuldSoul quoted above, the Bible directly condemns such actions:
Jesus said: "Look out that you are not misled; for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, ‘I am he,’ and, ‘The due time has approached.’ Do not go after them." Luke 21:8
Can you face the devilish details that this scripture sets forth? Or are you interested in denying the facts?
Consider also this: doesn't the Bible say that he who is unfaithful in what is least will be unfaithful in much? It's almost trivial to demonstrate that JW leaders have been extremely unfaithful in all manner of details concerning all manner of subjects. Can you get around the Bible's direction here, and still claim that JW leaders are God's exclusive spokesmen?
AlanF