How about this effect that no one, certainly not the GB, seems to have thought of.
An elder in our congregation is about to be removed, for something completely unrelated to porn. But, now that the July 15 2006 WT has come out with its 3 page Questions From Readers article about how "appointed men" are "no longer qualified" if caught viewing porn, every single person in the congregation is going to think, "Ah, so old Brother So and So was surfin' the web sites..."
The anouncement to be read to the congregation is just "Brother So and So is no longer an elder"--no explanation given. And JWs are well-conditioned to imagine the worst if no details are supplied.
I imagine that every single elder who steps down now will have a cloud over him, with the congregation thinking "Hmmm. wonder if he's really a wanker..."
Actually, the cynical side of me wonders if this is an intended consequence of the Society's new "teaching"--as if they expect lots of elders to be stepping down, and this adds pressure on them to remain as elders, so as to avoid suspicion of being a porno perv.
Doinmypart, watch your back!