Mondo
The problem with the dual nature hypothesis is that it is contradictory to say that one person is 100% two things. One could be part one thing and part another, but not 100% of two completely different things.
There you go assuming again, tell us how you know man doesn't have a spirit.
I'm 100% many things! I'm sorry, Mondo, I didn't see this post to KennesonI am one of Jehovah's Witnesses, but even as such I would not say that each detail of what I believe 100% corresponds to everything the WT states.
I have to ask what's wrong? Don't you trust the "faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time?" Is some of the food spoiled?
The WHO remained the same, the WHAT changed.
That sounds a little trinitarian to me! Are you sure it is 100% of the same "WHO"?