Gary:
Ahh Divinity...I agree but the real problems come when peoples perception of divinity differ...
This shouldn't be a problem, as it is experienced even within the Christian faith.
...and one perception is deemed to be true and another conversely false, thus creating intolerance. Whether you experience the divine as Christ spirit or whether you experience it as the 'God, Goddess' or 'Great Spirit' shouldnt matter and doesnt to the majority of pagans.
This is nearer the root of the issue... intolerance.
Kneeling in terms of reverenceand [against?] being made to feel unworthy however are to be contrasted as they are clearly different.
Before I answer this point can I just clarify that you are making a contrast (as highlighted)?
If you are contrasting reverential kneeling against being humiliated then I agree. Not all kneeling is done out of being abased by another. In the example that I refer to it is a spontaneous reaction to being in the presence of someone/thing awesome.
Going further, It tends to be Christians who suggest that their perception of divinity is the condition upon which enlightenment, rapture, resurrection, (amend to suit) depends and this is where the arguments arise. It leads to an almighty bun fight about whose God is the 'bestest' and whose God is the most powerful - personally I dont see the point.
I disagree. It is a common complaint and altogether very human. Every group tends to prefer their own deity, be it Pan, Ishtar, Jesus, Allah, Vishnu or George Dubya.
Why should anyone have to convert to a particular path in order to be 'saved'?- Why cant spirituality be something that is free rather than imposed? (to suggest that I will lose my life if I dont convert is an imposition in my view.)
This comment completely misses the thrust of DeputyDogs points. I'm not attempting to make a fuss, but definitions and terminology are at the root of so many misunderstandings. Please allow me to elaborate somewhat:
From a Calvinist Christian perspective God chose millenia back and He bides his time and He makes the change in the individual. Its not as if the individual is passive in the matter but neither do they actively "convert" themselves. The flip side of the coin should be that no Christian should say that another is not ultimately "saved" because he's simply in no position to make that call. Personally I find CS Lewis (its worth reading the whole thread minutely) to be one of the more tolerant on this subject.
It makes no sense to me.
Of course not. What do you expect? You work in legal!
Dawn:
Didier (Narkissos) might have a few things to say about that comparison table. While there are a few similarities between various dieties there are also so many differences as to render such a comparison impossible. Its similar to saying that you and I are the same person when we clearly are not (at least I hope for Gary's sake we're not).